| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
| Graphics | 121% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels. |
| Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
| Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)
| Motherboard | Asrock X79 Extreme4 (all builds) |
| Memory | 12.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
| Display | 3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20120625 |
| Uptime | 0.2 Days |
| Run Date | Apr 06 '18 at 23:12 |
| Run Duration | 146 Seconds |
| Run User | GBR-User |
| Background CPU | 14% |
PC Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core i7-3820
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
|
64.9%
Good
|
67% 109 Pts
|
31% 230 Pts
|
14% 229 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485
CLim: 1987 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 391.35
Performing below potential (40th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
121%
Outstanding
|
131% 186 fps
|
119% 147 fps
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Kingston HyperX DDR3 2133 C11 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
|
66%
Good
|
70% 24.4 GB/s
|
39% 13.7 GB/s
|
60% 66.9 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical X79 Extreme4 Builds (Compare 249 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asrock X79 Extreme4 - $290
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i7-3820IntelBench 70%, 38,674 samples | 86x |
| Core i7-3930KIntel $280Bench 74%, 33,172 samples | 51x |
| Core i7-4820KIntel $110Bench 72%, 23,169 samples | 31x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 980Nvidia $500Bench 59%, 167,107 samples | 25x |
| GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 23x |
| GTX 660Nvidia $170Bench 20%, 123,956 samples | 18x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 28% - Poor | Total price: $818 |