User System

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 50%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 45%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (27th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 73 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics50.9% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Very high background CPU (54%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. Find active processes with Windows task manager (CTRL+SHIFT+ESC).
SystemECT A_M_I
MotherboardGigabyte Z77X-D3H
Memory19.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20121024
Uptime4.4 Days
Run DateApr 05 '18 at 17:19
Run Duration230 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 54%

 PC Performing below expectations (27th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Extreme
Intel Core i7-3770K-$400
Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-3770K CPU @ 3.50GHz, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.1 GHz, turbo 4.8 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
62.6% Good
1-Core 104
2-Core 177
68% 140 Pts
4-Core 322
8-Core 470
51% 396 Pts
64-Core 492
33% 492 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 62.6%
Great: 81%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$540
CLim: 2062 MHz, MLim: 2551 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 391.35
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
50.9% Above average
Lighting 432
Reflection 390
Parallax 458
113% 426 fps
MRender 164
Gravity 164
Splatting 164
48% 164 fps
Poor: 90%
This bench: 50.9%
Great: 115%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Toshiba- TOSHIBA-TR150 960GB
236GB free
Firmware: SAFZ12.3 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
49.4% Average
Read 263
Write 178
Mixed 186
46% 209 MB/s
4K Read 25.8
4K Write 39.9
4K Mixed 9.64
73% 25.1 MB/s
DQ Read 198
DQ Write 129
DQ Mixed 44.9
66% 124 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 49.4%
Great: 80%
Samsung 830 256GB-$261
134GB free
Firmware: CXM0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
40.3% Average
Read 341
Write 247
Mixed 263
63% 284 MB/s
4K Read 1.58
4K Write 36.9
4K Mixed 3.56
26% 14 MB/s
DQ Read 136
DQ Write 44
DQ Mixed 20.2
33% 66.8 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 40.3%
Great: 85%
Samsung 840 Evo 500GB-$120
56GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT0DB6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 76% Great: 124%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$107
54GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
104% Outstanding
Read 505
Write 398
Mixed 412
98% 438 MB/s
4K Read 36.9
4K Write 78.1
4K Mixed 44.4
154% 53.1 MB/s
DQ Read 322
DQ Write 208
DQ Mixed 116
126% 215 MB/s
Poor: 76%
This bench: 104%
Great: 134%
Hitachi HDS723020BLE640 2TB
128GB free
Firmware: MX4OAAB0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
43.1% Average
Read 79.2
Write 70.7
Mixed 61
53% 70.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.53
4K Write 1.62
4K Mixed 0.21
75% 0.78 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 43.1%
Great: 102%
Seagate Expansion 2TB
1TB free, PID 2322
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
53.1% Above average
Read 98.7
Write 117
Mixed 35.7
104% 83.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.94
4K Write 4.22
4K Mixed 0.46
162% 1.87 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 53.1%
Great: 53%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Unknown CM3B8G2C1600L11 029E CMX16GX3M2A1600C11 029E CM3B8G2C1600L11 029E CMX8GX3M1A1600C11 32GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
56.4% Above average
MC Read 20.1
MC Write 20
MC Mixed 17.9
55% 19.3 GB/s
SC Read 16
SC Write 17.5
SC Mixed 17.5
49% 17 GB/s
Latency 63.3
63% 63.3 ns
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9600K $218Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Crucial MX500 250GB $46
Intel Core i5-9400F $155Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super) $170Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i7-9700K $370Nvidia RTX 2060 $340Samsung 850 Pro 512GB $204
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $73SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $40Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $63SanDisk Extreme 32GB $46
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $643SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback