Performance Results


Gaming 5% Tree trunk	Desktop 53% Yacht	Workstation 5% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 54.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	0.64% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 8GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

PC Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon W3503-$32 1,688 User benchmarks, average bench 49% CPU0 PROCESSOR, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 2.4 GHz Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	54.2% Above average	Memory 88.3 1-Core 60.8 2-Core 119 57% 89.3 Pts	4-Core 120 8-Core 121 16% 120 Pts	64-Core 121 8% 121 Pts
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 54.2% Great: 55%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia Quadro NVS 295 975 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Nvidia(10DE 062E) 256MB Ram: 256MB, Driver: 341.44 Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	0.64% Terrible	Lighting 0.6 Reflection 1.31 Parallax 0.28 0% 0.73 fps	MRender 3.1 Gravity 0.43 Splatting 0.3 1% 1.28 fps
Poor: 0% ↑ This bench: 0.64% Great: 1%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Pro 128GB-$70 18,195 User benchmarks, average bench 99% 99GB free Firmware: EXM0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below potential (3^rd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 1484 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 206 (B1) Unknown 99 99 18 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 69 63 31 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 98 98 1267 (EB) Unknown 99 99 1 (F1) Unknown 99 99 3595494066	63.4% Good	Read 216 Write 255 Mixed 237 53% 236 MB/s	4K Read 21.9 4K Write 51.9 4K Mixed 31.1 100% 35 MB/s	DQ Read 177 DQ Write 172 DQ Mixed 96.7 94% 148 MB/s
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 63.4% Great: 119%
RAIDVOL 500GB 14 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 401GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1.0. Max speed: PIO DMA 16 MB/s Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	63.8% Good	Read 113 Write 109 Mixed 109 83% 111 MB/s	4K Read 0.53 4K Write 1.35 4K Mixed 0.4 92% 0.76 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 63.8% Great: 56%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown ID:02 FE EBJ20EF8BCFA-DJ-F ID:80 CE M391B5673FH0-CH9 ID:02 FE EBJ20EF8BCFA-DJ-F ID:80 CE M391B5673FH0-CH9 42GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz 2048, 2048, 2048, 2048, 34816 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	38.8% Below average	MC Read 13.7 MC Write 12.5 MC Mixed 12.5 37% 12.9 GB/s	SC Read 11.2 SC Write 11.1 SC Mixed 11.5 32% 11.3 GB/s	Latency 69.2 58% 69.2 ns
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 38.8% Great: 39%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 8%

Tree trunk

Desktop 59%

Gunboat

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

RAM
ID:80 AD HMT125U7TFR8C-H9 ID:80 AD HMT125U7TFR8C-H9 ID:80 AD HMT125U7TFR8C-H9 ID:80 AD HMT125U7TFR8C-H9 42GBUnknownBench 37%, 128 samples	22x
ID:80 AD HMT351U7BFR8C-H9 ID:80 AD HMT351U7BFR8C-H9 ID:80 AD HMT351U7BFR8C-H9 46GBUnknownBench 45%, 108 samples	18x
ID:80 CE M391B5673FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M391B5673FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M391B5673FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M391B5673FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M391B5673FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M391B5673FH0-CH9 46GBUnknownBench 46%, 280 samples	16x

Value: 62% - Good

Total price: $258

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16