| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 47.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average. |
| Graphics | 13.4% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks. |
| Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
| Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
6 years ago, 6 years ago.
| Motherboard | Asus PRIME H110M-P (all builds) |
| Memory | 1.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz |
| Display | 1440 x 900 - 32 Bit colores |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20170704 |
| Uptime | 6.1 Days |
| Run Date | Apr 04 '18 at 05:38 |
| Run Duration | 153 Seconds |
| Run User | ECU-User |
| Background CPU | 100% |
PC Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
47.5%
Average
|
43% 66.1 Pts
|
21% 165 Pts
|
10% 156 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 750-Ti-$92
Gigabyte(1458 36CA) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1333 MHz, MLim: 1350 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 391.24
|
13.4%
Very poor
|
14% 14.1 fps
|
13% 16.5 fps
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Kingston 9905678-139.A00G 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
|
26.7%
Poor
|
27% 9.5 GB/s
|
14% 4.93 GB/s
|
39% 102 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical PRIME H110M-P Builds (Compare 384 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asus PRIME H110M-P
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i5-7400Intel $110Bench 64%, 234,266 samples | 96x |
| Core i7-7700Intel $167Bench 76%, 256,717 samples | 68x |
| Core i3-7100Intel $70Bench 57%, 79,299 samples | 53x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| HD 630 (Desktop Kaby Lake)IntelBench 5%, 153,031 samples | 84x |
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 36x |
| GTX 1050Nvidia $101Bench 26%, 269,381 samples | 22x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 70% - Good | Total price: $138 |