LNV LNV11x5

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (25th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 75 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 15.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Boot Drive	44.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Very high background CPU (62%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	LNV LNV11x5 (all builds)
Motherboard	LNV LNV11x5
Memory	4.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20131011
Uptime	0.6 Days
Run Date	Apr 03 '18 at 17:33
Run Duration	118 Seconds
Run User	BRA-User
Background CPU	62%

PC Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Celeron 847-$259 3,990 User benchmarks, average bench 34% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 1.1 GHz Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	15.7% Very poor	Memory 23 1-Core 17.1 2-Core 44.4 17% 28.2 Pts	4-Core 51.3 8-Core 41.2 6% 46.2 Pts	64-Core 50.9 3% 50.9 Pts
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 15.7% Great: 41%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow UV400 240GB-$89 105,079 User benchmarks, average bench 71% 28GB free (System drive) Firmware: 0C3J96R9 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 3250 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 507 (64) Unknown 100 100 4420928 (65) Unknown 100 100 877088 (AA) Unknown 100 100 0 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AE) Unknown 100 100 178 (AF) Unknown 100 100 0 (B0) Unknown 100 100 0 (B1) Unknown 97 97 1303 (B2) Unknown 100 100 0 (B4) Unknown 100 100 1338 (B7) Unknown 96 96 20 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 38 100 219044642854 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 100 100 0 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 100 100 0 (CC) Soft ECC correction 100 100 0 (E7) Temperature 96 96 4 (E9) Unknown 100 100 7764 (EA) Unknown 100 100 4809 (F1) Unknown 100 100 6164 (F2) Unknown 100 100 10612 (FA) Read error retry rate 100 100 0	44.9% Average	Read 453 Write 250 Mixed 124 60% 276 MB/s	4K Read 13.5 4K Write 7.66 4K Mixed 4.4 30% 8.53 MB/s	DQ Read 76 DQ Write 51.8 DQ Mixed 18.9 26% 48.9 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 44.9% Great: 88%
Seagate Momentus 2.5" 1TB 266,123 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 180GB free Firmware: 2BA30001 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (61^st percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 4 (02) Throughput performance 252 252 0 (03) Spinup time 92 92 2553 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 297 (05) Reallocated sector count 252 252 0 (07) Seek error rate 252 252 0 (08) Seek timer performance 252 252 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 2029 (0A) Spinup retry count 252 252 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 15 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 317 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 12 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 40 (C2) HDA temperature 64 57 184684838946 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 100 100 0 (C4) Reallocation count 252 252 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 252 252 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 252 252 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 100 100 436 (DF) Load/unload retry count 100 100 15 (E1) Load/Unload cycle count 80 80 205098	47.1% Average	Read 77.2 Write 86.8 Mixed 34.2 48% 66.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.35 4K Write 1.84 4K Mixed 0.32 85% 0.84 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 47.1% Great: 59%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown KRE-D3S1333M/8G 1x8GB 46 User benchmarks, average bench 23% 1 of 4 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile)	20.1% Poor	MC Read 6.6 MC Write 8.9 MC Mixed 7.7 22% 7.73 GB/s	SC Read 5.5 SC Write 3.2 SC Mixed 2.2 10% 3.63 GB/s	Latency 299 13% 299 ns
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 20.1% Great: 29%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

LNV LNV11x5

Performance Results

PC Performing below expectations (25th percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Feedback

PC Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)