Performance Results


Gaming 1% Tree trunk	Desktop 9% Tree trunk	Workstation 1% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (27th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 73 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 17.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics	1.11% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	14.2% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory	2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (91%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (27^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Atom x5-Z8350 9,056 User benchmarks, average bench 21% CHV, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 1.45 GHz, turbo 1.65 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (28^th percentile)	17.8% Very poor	Memory 30.5 1-Core 12.3 2-Core 18.1 15% 20.3 Pts	4-Core 30.1 8-Core 37 4% 33.5 Pts	64-Core 39.8 2% 39.8 Pts
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 17.8% Great: 28%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD Graphics 16,763 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Legend(17AA 3809) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4474 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	1.11% Terrible	Lighting 1.13 Reflection 1.88 Parallax 1.56 1% 1.53 fps	MRender 1.71 Gravity 1.1 Splatting 2.35 2% 1.72 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.11% Great: 2%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung BGND3R 31GB 12GB free (System drive) Firmware: 0.1 Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	14.2% Very poor	Read 127 Write 39.7 Mixed 78.6 18% 81.8 MB/s	4K Read 6.33 4K Write 9.43 4K Mixed 4.02 20% 6.59 MB/s	DQ Read 26 DQ Write 11.3 DQ Mixed 5.51 8% 14.3 MB/s

Generic EC4MW SD Card 64GB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 14% 19GB free Firmware: 3.0 Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	25.9% Poor	Read 76.6 Write 12.1 Mixed 22.3 27% 37 MB/s	4K Read 4.64 4K Write 0.8 4K Mixed 0.59 273% 2.01 MB/s
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 25.9% Great: 26%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 1x2GB 99,586 User benchmarks, average bench 17% 1 of 1 slots used 2GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	13% Very poor	MC Read 5.4 MC Write 5.5 MC Mixed 4.5 15% 5.13 GB/s	SC Read 0.2 SC Write 1.3 SC Mixed 0.4 2% 0.63 GB/s	Latency 252 16% 252 ns
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 13% Great: 26%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 0%

Incomplete

Desktop 0%

Incomplete

Workstation 0%

Incomplete

CPU
Atom x5-Z8350IntelBench 21%, 9,056 samples	2x

GPU
HD GraphicsIntelBench 1%, 16,763 samples	2x

RAM
1x4GBUnknownBench 28%, 154,807 samples	1x
1x2GBUnknownBench 17%, 99,586 samples	1x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16