Performance Results


Gaming 2% Tree trunk	Desktop 35% Sail boat	Workstation 2% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 36.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	0.29% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	18.1% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory	5GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 5GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

6 years ago, 6 years ago.

PC Performing as expected (50^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core2 Duo U9600 323 User benchmarks, average bench 33% Microprocessor, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 1.6 GHz Performing way above expectations (89^th percentile)	36.8% Below average	Memory 66.5 1-Core 23.6 2-Core 45 33% 45 Pts	4-Core 44.5 8-Core 44.8 6% 44.7 Pts	64-Core 45.6 3% 45.6 Pts
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 36.8% Great: 38%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel Mobile Series 4 Express Chipset Family 23,924 User benchmarks, average bench 0% Dell(1028 0277) 2.2GB Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 8.15.10.2869 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	0.29% Terrible	Lighting 0.33 Reflection 0.27 Parallax 0.31 0% 0.31 fps	MRender 0.29 Gravity 0.47 Splatting 0.43 0% 0.4 fps
Poor: 0% ↑ This bench: 0.29% Great: 1%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung PB22-JS3 FDE 2.5" 128GB 813 User benchmarks, average bench 23% 53GB free (System drive) Firmware: VBM9 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (09) Power-on hours count 98 98 5967 (0C) Power cycle count 96 96 3643 (AF) Unknown 98 98 1 (B0) Unknown 100 100 0 (B1) Unknown 95 95 269 (B2) Unknown 47 47 32 (B3) Unknown 93 93 234 (B4) Unknown 93 93 3606 (B5) Unknown 99 99 2 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 99 99 2 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 253 253 0 (E8) Unknown 47 47 28 (E9) Unknown 81 81 815110937	18.1% Very poor	Read 203 Write 59.4 Mixed 102 26% 121 MB/s	4K Read 7.28 4K Write 5.37 4K Mixed 5.36 21% 6 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 18.1% Great: 32%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 5GB 14,654 User benchmarks, average bench 18% null MHz 1024, 4096 MB Performing as expected (42^nd percentile)	14.9% Very poor	MC Read 5.2 MC Write 4 MC Mixed 4.2 13% 4.47 GB/s	SC Read 4.6 SC Write 4 SC Mixed 4.6 12% 4.4 GB/s	Latency 110 36% 110 ns
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 14.9% Great: 34%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16