Lenovo 1095CD9

Performance Results


Gaming 29% Raft	Desktop 65% Destroyer	Workstation 28% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (25th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 75 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 56.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	40.8% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	64.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Very high background CPU (52%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Lenovo 1095CD9 (all builds)
Motherboard	LENOVO LENOVO
Memory	34 GB free of 64 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20150706
Uptime	1.9 Days
Run Date	Apr 01 '18 at 09:18
Run Duration	328 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	52%

Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2643 0 1,437 User benchmarks, average bench 68% CPU 0, 2 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.3 GHz Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	56.5% Above average	Memory 65 1-Core 69.9 2-Core 143 54% 92.6 Pts	4-Core 259 8-Core 435 42% 347 Pts	64-Core 786 49% 786 Pts
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 56.5% Great: 76%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117 1,368,019 User benchmarks, average bench 56% Zotac(19DA 1438) CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 390.77 Relative performance (0^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	40.8% Average	Lighting 43.8 Reflection 47.9 Parallax 55.4 36% 49.1 fps	MRender 59.5 Gravity 60.9 Splatting 64.3 51% 61.6 fps
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 40.8% Great: 60%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$109 695,664 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 232GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below potential (2^nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 98 98 8859 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 12 (B1) Unknown 98 98 40 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 66 58 34 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 1 (F1) Unknown 99 99 22663803336	64.4% Good	Read 265 Write 210 Mixed 217 51% 231 MB/s	4K Read 30.8 4K Write 40 4K Mixed 31.6 108% 34.1 MB/s	DQ Read 186 DQ Write 144 DQ Mixed 91 88% 140 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 64.4% Great: 134%
WD Green 4TB (2013)-$136 31,988 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 83GB free Firmware: 0A80 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (27^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 183 175 7841 (04) Start/Stop count 96 96 4057 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 66 66 25091 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 472 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 271 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 96 96 314147 (C2) HDA temperature 115 101 37 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	56.3% Above average	Read 105 Write 90.9 Mixed 92.8 72% 96.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.77 4K Mixed 0.19 75% 0.82 MB/s
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 56.3% Great: 87%
WD WD4002FFWX-68TZ4N0 4TB 829 User benchmarks, average bench 93% 56GB free Firmware: 0A83 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 138 138 100 (03) Spinup time 147 147 30086922626 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 320 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 33 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 128 128 18 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 6363 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 9 (C0) Power-off retract count 98 98 2548 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 98 98 2548 (C2) HDA temperature 133 133 244814774317 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 33 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0	67.9% Good	Read 138 Write 98.2 Mixed 120 90% 119 MB/s	4K Read 0.42 4K Write 2.86 4K Mixed 0.29 103% 1.19 MB/s
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 67.9% Great: 114%
WD WD4002FFWX-68TZ4N0 4TB 829 User benchmarks, average bench 93% 27GB free Firmware: 0A83 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (24^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 136 136 108 (03) Spinup time 133 133 34386018704 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 57 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 128 128 18 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 6339 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 8 (C0) Power-off retract count 99 99 1992 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 99 99 1992 (C2) HDA temperature 142 142 244814774314 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0	80.9% Excellent	Read 134 Write 148 Mixed 162 112% 148 MB/s	4K Read 0.71 4K Write 3.14 4K Mixed 0.5 144% 1.45 MB/s
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 80.9% Great: 114%
WDC WD40 EZRX-00SPEB0 4TB 8 User benchmarks, average bench 15% 86GB free, PID 2352 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing as expected (44^th percentile)	16.4% Very poor	Read 34.7 Write 33.2 Mixed 31.8 42% 33.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.67 4K Write 1.28 4K Mixed 0.25 55% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 16.4% Great: 21%
TOSHIBA DT01ACA300 3TB 39 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 28GB free, PID 55aa Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Performing above expectations (62^nd percentile)	55.5% Above average	Read 132 Write 140 Mixed 7.6 108% 93.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.44 4K Write 1.86 4K Mixed 0.14 70% 0.81 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 55.5% Great: 71%
WDC WD30 EZRX-00MMMB0 3TB 32 User benchmarks, average bench 37% 27GB free, PID 55aa Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Performing as expected (40^th percentile)	37.2% Below average	Read 85 Write 92.1 Mixed 13.7 75% 63.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.41 4K Write 1.52 4K Mixed 0.13 58% 0.69 MB/s
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 37.2% Great: 49%
WDC WD40 03FZEX-00Z4SA0 4TB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 36% 23GB free, PID 1562 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	44.6% Average	Read 133 Write 78.5 Mixed 125 138% 112 MB/s	4K Read 0.52 4K Write 2.61 4K Mixed 0.29 100% 1.14 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 44.6% Great: 52%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Micron 36JSF1G72PZ-1 8x8GB 25 User benchmarks, average bench 93% 8 of 8 slots used 64GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile)	75% Very good	MC Read 32.4 MC Write 32 MC Mixed 27.9 88% 30.8 GB/s	SC Read 9.3 SC Write 4.6 SC Mixed 5.7 19% 6.53 GB/s	Latency 114 35% 114 ns
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 75% Great: 130%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $178	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Lenovo 1095CD9

Performance Results

PC Performing below expectations (25th percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Feedback

PC Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)