HP Compaq 6000 Pro SFF PC

Performance Results


Gaming 17% Surfboard	Desktop 60% Destroyer	Workstation 13% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (74th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 26 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 51.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	28.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	93.5% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 16GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

System	HP Compaq 6000 Pro SFF PC (all builds)
Motherboard	Hewlett-Packard 3048h
Memory	12.7 GB free of 16.0039 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20151019
Uptime	0.2 Days
Run Date	Mar 31 '18 at 12:52
Run Duration	448 Seconds
Run User	IDN-User
Background CPU	5%

PC Performing above expectations (74^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core2 Quad Q9550-$161 34,093 User benchmarks, average bench 49% XU1 PROCESSOR, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.85 GHz Performing above expectations (76^th percentile)	51.9% Above average	Memory 77.1 1-Core 40.5 2-Core 81.3 44% 66.3 Pts	4-Core 157 8-Core 155 21% 156 Pts	64-Core 162 10% 162 Pts
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 51.9% Great: 57%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-$101 269,381 User benchmarks, average bench 26% Nvidia(10DE 11C0) 2GB CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 391.35 Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	28.6% Poor	Lighting 35.1 Reflection 23.8 Parallax 24.6 29% 27.8 fps	MRender 34.3 Gravity 36.4 Splatting 34.3 29% 35 fps
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 28.6% Great: 28%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Crucial M4 256GB-$218 17,938 User benchmarks, average bench 61% 121GB free (System drive) Firmware: 040H Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below potential (100^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 55 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 252 (AA) Unknown 100 100 0 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AD) Unknown 100 100 5 (AE) Unknown 100 100 53 (B5) Unknown 100 100 657135239241 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 82 (C2) HDA temperature 100 100 0 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 100 100 71 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (CA) Data Address Mark errors 100 100 0 (CE) Flying height 100 100 0	93.5% Outstanding	Read 227 Write 230 Mixed 186 48% 215 MB/s	4K Read 31.7 4K Write 146 4K Mixed 62.8 206% 80 MB/s	DQ Read 116 DQ Write 144 DQ Mixed 84.2 76% 115 MB/s
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 93.5% Great: 74%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 1TB-$70 337,642 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 827GB free Firmware: CC6B Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing above expectations (73^rd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 117 99 137008004 (03) Spinup time 95 92 0 (04) Start/Stop count 96 96 4402 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 81 60 123052905 (09) Power-on hours count 95 95 4524 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 2194 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 96 30065229832 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 63 54 673316901 (C2) HDA temperature 37 46 90194313253 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 42 31 137008004 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (F0) Head flying hours 100 253 29613799516080 (F1) Unknown 100 253 220190036 (F2) Unknown 100 253 1064106131	60.7% Good	Read 101 Write 110 Mixed 24.5 57% 78.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.84 4K Write 1.43 4K Mixed 0.59 127% 0.95 MB/s
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 60.7% Great: 68%
Mass Storage Device 67GB 79 User benchmarks, average bench 6% 62GB free, PID 1212 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing below expectations (24^th percentile)	3.4% Terrible	Read 8.07 Write 4.96 Mixed 4.19 7% 5.74 MB/s	4K Read 2.69 4K Write 0.17 4K Mixed 0.17 21% 1.01 MB/s
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 3.4% Great: 20%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown ID:01 98 9905471-006.A00LF ID:01 98 9905471-006.A00LF ID:01 98 9905471-006.A00LF ID:01 98 9905471-006.A00LF 52GB 4 User benchmarks, average bench 30% 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 0 MHz 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 36864 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	22.9% Poor	MC Read 8.2 MC Write 6.7 MC Mixed 6.8 21% 7.23 GB/s	SC Read 6.3 SC Write 6.3 SC Mixed 7.1 19% 6.57 GB/s	Latency 86.1 46% 86.1 ns
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 22.9% Great: 44%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Compaq 6000 Pro SFF PC Builds (Compare 440 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 4%

Tree trunk

Desktop 40%

Speed boat

Workstation 4%

Tree trunk

System: HP Compaq 6000 Pro SFF PC

CPU
Core2 Duo E8400Intel $89Bench 40%, 68,540 samples	97x
Core2 Duo E7500Intel $109Bench 39%, 39,897 samples	81x
Core2 Duo E8500Intel $110Bench 42%, 18,841 samples	34x

GPU
Q45/Q43 Express ChipsetIntelBench 0%, 16,152 samples	205x
GeForce GT 710NvidiaBench 3%, 187,161 samples	36x
GT 1030NvidiaBench 14%, 185,384 samples	27x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	12x
SSD Plus 120GBSanDisk $42Bench 58%, 87,912 samples	6x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	5x

RAM
ID:80 CE M378B5673EH1-CH9 ID:80 CE M378B5673EH1-CH9 40GBUnknownBench 22%, 367 samples	16x
ID:80 AD HMT351U6CFR8C-PB ID:80 AD HMT351U6CFR8C-PB ID:80 AD HMT351U6CFR8C-PB ID:80 AD HMT351U6CFR8C-PB 52GBUnknownBench 33%, 46 samples	7x
ID:02 FE EBJ21UE8BDF0-DJ-F ID:02 FE EBJ21UE8BDF0-DJ-F 40GBUnknownBench 25%, 505 samples	7x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 47% - Average

Total price: $116

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16