Asus X555YA

Performance Results

Benchmarks - excluding HDD
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 30%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 27.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics2.07% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive74.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Run History
20 months ago, 20 months ago.
SystemAsus X555YA  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK X555YA
Memory4.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150902
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 30 '18 at 23:39
Run Duration93 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing above expectations (64th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Extreme
AMD A8-7410 APU (2015 M.Ca)
P0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
27.4% Poor
1-Core 42.2
2-Core 83.2
30% 62.7 Pts
4-Core 151
8-Core 151
21% 151 Pts
64-Core 150
10% 150 Pts
Poor: 16%
This bench: 27.4%
Great: 28%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
AMD Radeon R5
Asus(1043 1B9D) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 16.6
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
2.07% Terrible
Lighting 8.4
Reflection 15.2
Parallax 12.3
2% 12 fps
MRender 6.8
Gravity 7.1
Splatting 9.1
2% 7.67 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.07%
Great: 2%
Drive Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
2.5" SATA SSD 3MG2-P 496GB
345GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M150821 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
74.2% Very good
Read 490
Write 419
Mixed 460
102% 456 MB/s
4K Read 20.7
4K Write 36.3
4K Mixed 25.8
84% 27.6 MB/s
DQ Read 72.3
DQ Write 52.2
DQ Mixed 31
32% 51.8 MB/s
Poor: 68%
This bench: 74.2%
Great: 117%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Hynix HMT451S6BFR8A-PB HMT451S6CFR6A-PB 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
21.4% Poor
MC Read 8.8
MC Write 5.1
MC Mixed 7.3
20% 7.07 GB/s
SC Read 6.7
SC Write 5.4
SC Mixed 7.8
19% 6.63 GB/s
Latency 129
31% 129 ns
Poor: 11%
This bench: 21.4%
Great: 21%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical X555YA Builds (Compare 169 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 30%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard

System: Asus X555YA

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 21% - Poor Total price: $55
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9400F $150Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $244Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-9600K $200AMD RX 590 $180Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $150
Intel Core i7-9700K $360Nvidia RTX 2060 $324Samsung 850 Pro 512GB $230
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $65SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $34Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $58SanDisk Extreme 32GB $46
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $613SanDisk Extreme 16GB $24
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback