HP Z220 CMT Workstation

Performance Results


Gaming 7% Tree trunk	Desktop 63% Destroyer	Workstation 6% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	0.54% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	87% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (21%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	HP Z220 CMT Workstation (all builds)
Motherboard	Hewlett-Packard 1790
Memory	11.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170706
Uptime	6.9 Days
Run Date	Mar 29 '18 at 18:25
Run Duration	264 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	21%

PC Performing as expected (47^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-3470-$59 223,595 User benchmarks, average bench 63% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (72^nd percentile)	65.5% Good	Memory 83.4 1-Core 93 2-Core 183 70% 120 Pts	4-Core 278 8-Core 279 37% 278 Pts	64-Core 351 22% 351 Pts
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 65.5% Great: 71%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia Quadro NVS 450 580 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Nvidia(10DE 0619) 256MB Ram: 256MB, Driver: 342.0 Performing as expected (55^th percentile)	0.54% Terrible	Lighting 0.53 Reflection 1.04 Parallax 0.09 0% 0.56 fps	MRender 1.67 Gravity 0.37 Splatting 0.83 1% 0.95 fps
Poor: 0% ↑ This bench: 0.54% Great: 1%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$109 695,664 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 360GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT01B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 96 96 18223 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 175 (B1) Unknown 96 96 67 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 65 55 35 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 103 (F1) Unknown 99 99 52164088303	87% Excellent	Read 506 Write 402 Mixed 414 98% 441 MB/s	4K Read 37.1 4K Write 73.8 4K Mixed 23.6 126% 44.8 MB/s	DQ Read 40.1 DQ Write 194 DQ Mixed 94.7 79% 110 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 87% Great: 134%
SanDisk Ultra USB 3.0 64GB-$9 17,023 User benchmarks, average bench 27% 56GB free, PID 5581 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed Performing below expectations (34^th percentile)	17.5% Very poor	Read 33.2 Write 20.3 Mixed 24.5 31% 26 MB/s	4K Read 5.65 4K Write 2.26 4K Mixed 1.28 141% 3.06 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 17.5% Great: 39%
ST380819 AS 80GB 33GB free, PID 1001 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	18.6% Very poor	Read 33.6 Write 48.9 Mixed 46.6 59% 43 MB/s	4K Read 0.35 4K Write 0.96 4K Mixed 0.39 47% 0.57 MB/s

Generic External 320GB 113 User benchmarks, average bench 17% 7GB free, PID 1340 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)	13.6% Very poor	Read 36.7 Write 33.2 Mixed 34.5 44% 34.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.18 4K Write 0.33 4K Mixed 0.12 16% 0.21 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 13.6% Great: 20%
ST320LT0 07-9ZV142 320GB 3GB free, PID 1001 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	17.8% Very poor	Read 35.9 Write 52.9 Mixed 40.4 58% 43.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.19 4K Write 0.33 4K Mixed 0.1 15% 0.21 MB/s

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M378B5273DH0-CK0 M378B5273DH0-CK0 Micron 16JTF51264AZ-1G6M1 M378B5273DH0-CK0 16GB 6 User benchmarks, average bench 52% 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile)	56.2% Above average	MC Read 20.5 MC Write 21.8 MC Mixed 17.2 57% 19.8 GB/s	SC Read 15.3 SC Write 16.1 SC Mixed 16 45% 15.8 GB/s	Latency 74.6 54% 74.6 ns
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 56.2% Great: 56%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Z220 CMT Workstation Builds (Compare 1,300 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 25%

Surfboard

Desktop 76%

Battleship

Workstation 21%

Surfboard

System: HP Z220 CMT Workstation

CPU
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples	615x
Xeon E3-1225 V2Intel $200Bench 70%, 2,869 samples	158x
Core i5-3470Intel $59Bench 63%, 223,595 samples	107x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	101x
HD 4000 (Desktop 1.15 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 52,547 samples	71x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	71x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	42x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	40x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	33x

RAM
M378B5273DH0-CK0 4x4GBSamsungBench 57%, 2,354 samples	33x
16JTF51264AZ-1G6M1 4x4GBMicronBench 55%, 1,512 samples	25x
HMT351U6CFR8C-PB 4x4GBHynixBench 58%, 7,298 samples	25x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 72% - Very good

Total price: $384

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16