Samsung 355V4C/356V4C/3445VC/3545VC

Performance Results

Benchmarks - excluding HDD
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop 24%
Workstation 15%
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 19.2%, this CPUs suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics4.73% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive63.9% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. Find active processes with Windows task manager (CTRL+SHIFT+ESC). CPU throttled at 89% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
SystemSamsung 355V4C/356V4C/3445VC/3545VC  (all builds)
MotherboardSAMSUNG NP355V5C-S05IN
Memory3.5 GB free of 6 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors, 1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130704
Uptime2.1 Days
Run DateMar 29 '18 at 18:09
Run Duration150 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 15%
CPU Throttled 89%

 PC Performing below expectations (35th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Single core Quad core Multi core
AMD A8-4500M APU
P0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.9 GHz, turbo 1.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
19.2% Very poor
SC Int 31.6
SC Float 26.4
SC Mixed 30.7
24% 29.6 Pts
QC Int 99.3
QC Float 79.7
QC Mixed 92.5
20% 90.5 Pts
MC Int 98.7
MC Float 85
MC Mixed 97.4
14% 93.7 Pts
Poor: 15%
This bench: 19.2%
Great: 30%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 7640G
Sanyo(144D C0DA) 512MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.1008
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
4.73% Terrible
Lighting 14
Reflection 19
Parallax 12.8
4% 15.3 fps
MRender 10.5
Gravity 10
Splatting 18.1
5% 12.9 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 4.73%
Great: 5%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$92
171GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT03B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
63.9% Good
Read 488
Write 368
Mixed 401
93% 419 MB/s
4K Read 23.2
4K Write 31
4K Mixed 12.8
68% 22.4 MB/s
DQ Read 25
DQ Write 56.6
DQ Mixed 12.2
17% 31.3 MB/s
Poor: 73%
This bench: 63.9%
Great: 125%
Mass Storage Device 500GB
184GB free, PID 6116
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
16.4% Very poor
Read 31
Write 29.3
Mixed 8.81
27% 23 MB/s
4K Read 0.66
4K Write 1.75
4K Mixed 0.19
68% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 16.4%
Great: 21%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Samsung M471B5773DH0-CK0 M471B5273EB0-CK0 6GB
800, 800 MHz
2048, 4096 MB
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
24.7% Poor
MC Read 11.8
MC Write 5.1
MC Mixed 8.8
24% 8.57 GB/s
SC Read 5.7
SC Write 4.6
SC Mixed 8
17% 6.1 GB/s
Latency 118
34% 118 ns
Poor: 25%
This bench: 24.7%
Great: 55%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds (explanation by AdoredTV).

Typical 355V4C/356V4C/3445VC/3545VC Builds (Compare 589 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop 27%
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk

System: Samsung 355V4C/356V4C/3445VC/3545VC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 83% - Excellent Total price: $28
The Best.
Intel Core i7-8700K $355Nvidia GTX 1070 $380Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $92
AMD Ryzen 5 2600 $139Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB $208Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $99
AMD Ryzen 5 1600 $108Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti $808Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $163
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $44Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $90SanDisk Extreme 64GB $128
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $601SanDisk Extreme 32GB $48
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $77Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $95SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $12
Today's hottest deals
User Guide  •  About  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback