HP Elite x2 1011 G1 Tablet

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (21st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 79 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 34.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Boot Drive45.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (74%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP Elite x2 1011 G1 Tablet  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 2009
Memory3.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kleuren
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180125
Uptime9 Days
Run DateMar 29 '18 at 15:08
Run Duration576 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU 74%

 PC Performing below expectations (21st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core M-5Y51
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.3 GHz, turbo 1.45 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
34.5% Below average
Memory 60
1-Core 21.7
2-Core 33
29% 38.2 Pts
4-Core 51.9
8-Core 77.9
8% 64.9 Pts
64-Core 75.7
5% 75.7 Pts
Poor: 25%
This bench: 34.5%
Great: 57%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZNTE256HMHP-000H1 256GB
100GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT22H0Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
45.3% Average
Read 472
Write 119
Mixed 222
59% 271 MB/s
4K Read 18.8
4K Write 28.2
4K Mixed 11.7
58% 19.6 MB/s
DQ Read 45.1
DQ Write 39.2
DQ Mixed 25
23% 36.4 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 45.3%
Great: 86%
Seagate Expansion 2TB
1TB free, PID null
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
36.6% Below average
Read 64
Write 102
Mixed 78.3
111% 81.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.29
4K Write 1.61
4K Mixed 0.28
65% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 36.6%
Great: 37%
WDC WD50 00AAKS-00M9A0 500GB
221GB free, PID 2773
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
41.5% Average
Read 109
Write 101
Mixed 70.8
116% 93.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.51
4K Write 1.17
4K Mixed 0.3
52% 0.66 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 41.5%
Great: 41%
WDC WD50 00AAKS-00M9A0 500GB
65GB free, PID 2773
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
31.5% Below average
Read 68.1
Write 84.3
Mixed 52.4
88% 68.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.46
4K Write 1.02
4K Mixed 0.31
47% 0.6 MB/s
Multiple Card Reader 32GB
16GB free, PID 6366
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
5.39% Terrible
Read 7.92
Write 6.76
Mixed 7.39
9% 7.36 MB/s
4K Read 1.46
4K Write 0.79
4K Mixed 0.47
48% 0.91 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 5.39%
Great: 20%
Generic Flash Disk 16GB
14GB free, PID 6387
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
4.26% Terrible
Read 14.9
Write 6.84
Mixed 7.69
11% 9.8 MB/s
4K Read 2.46
4K Write 0.01
4K Mixed 0.01
10% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 2%
This bench: 4.26%
Great: 8%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix 746448-381 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM LPDDR3 1600 MHz
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
34.7% Below average
MC Read 12
MC Write 14.1
MC Mixed 14
38% 13.4 GB/s
SC Read 5.1
SC Write 7
SC Mixed 1.9
13% 4.67 GB/s
Latency 128
31% 128 ns
Poor: 25%
This bench: 34.7%
Great: 49%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Elite x2 1011 G1 Tablet Builds (Compare 3 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 47%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: HP Elite x2 1011 G1 Tablet

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $179Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback