Monster TULPAR T7 V13.1

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 52%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 52.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics1.39% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive186% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 60% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
SystemMonster TULPAR T7 V13.1  (all builds)
MotherboardMONSTER TULPAR T7 V13.1
Memory7.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170619
Uptime1.3 Days
Run DateMar 29 '18 at 11:06
Run Duration146 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU 19%
CPU Throttled 60%

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 1.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
52.9% Above average
Memory 75
1-Core 52.8
2-Core 99
48% 75.6 Pts
4-Core 168
8-Core 250
26% 209 Pts
64-Core 249
15% 249 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 52.9%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics 630
Clevo(1558 8503) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 23.20.16.4927
Relative performance (0th percentile)
1.39% Terrible
Lighting 1.43
Reflection 12.3
Parallax 1.44
1% 5.07 fps
MRender 2.19
Gravity 1.4
Splatting 2.83
2% 2.14 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 1.39%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung PM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB
82GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CXB7401Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
186% Outstanding
Read 2,069
Write 891
Mixed 1,032
292% 1,331 MB/s
4K Read 41
4K Write 55.4
4K Mixed 37.1
139% 44.5 MB/s
DQ Read 186
DQ Write 108
DQ Mixed 70.7
73% 121 MB/s
Poor: 106%
This bench: 186%
Great: 236%
Seagate BUP Slim BL 2TB
1TB free
Firmware: 0304
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
60.3% Good
Read 104
Write 105
Mixed 69.3
69% 92.8 MB/s
4K Read 1.24
4K Write 3.84
4K Mixed 0.45
172% 1.84 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 60.3%
Great: 66%
WD WD10SPZX-00HKTT0 1TB
879GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
62.4% Good
Read 117
Write 99.2
Mixed 107
81% 108 MB/s
4K Read 2.1
4K Write 2.64
4K Mixed 0.38
179% 1.71 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 62.4%
Great: 79%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT8G4SFS824A.C8FAD1 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
59.6% Above average
MC Read 21.8
MC Write 24.1
MC Mixed 20.2
63% 22 GB/s
SC Read 10
SC Write 18
SC Mixed 13.8
40% 13.9 GB/s
Latency 90.3
44% 90.3 ns
Poor: 56%
This bench: 59.6%
Great: 78%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TULPAR T7 V13.1 Builds (Compare 88 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Monster TULPAR T7 V13.1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback