Asrock Z370 Extreme4

Performance Results


Gaming 31% Sail boat	Desktop 92% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 27% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 93.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	30.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	106% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago.

Motherboard	Asrock Z370 Extreme4 (all builds)
Memory	13.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit Farben, 1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20171124
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Mar 28 '18 at 18:55
Run Duration	192 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	15%

PC Performing as expected (48^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-8600K-$173 264,837 User benchmarks, average bench 91% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz Performing above expectations (72^nd percentile)	93.5% Outstanding	Memory 89.6 1-Core 133 2-Core 267 90% 163 Pts	4-Core 530 8-Core 721 79% 626 Pts	64-Core 766 47% 766 Pts
Poor: 79% ↑ This bench: 93.5% Great: 101%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD HD 7870-$203 42,130 User benchmarks, average bench 26% Gigabyte(1458 2554) 2GB CLim: 1100 MHz, MLim: 1200 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 18.3.4 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	30.4% Below average	Lighting 38.4 Reflection 34.2 Parallax 47.2 31% 39.9 fps	MRender 30.7 Gravity 32.3 Splatting 39.9 29% 34.3 fps
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 30.4% Great: 28%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 182GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT01B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (52^nd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 98 98 7604 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 1472 (B1) Unknown 95 95 92 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 99 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 65 46 35 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 99 99 231 (EB) Unknown 99 99 83 (F1) Unknown 99 99 17292862993	106% Outstanding	Read 515 Write 417 Mixed 251 87% 395 MB/s	4K Read 45.1 4K Write 86.3 4K Mixed 36.3 161% 55.9 MB/s	DQ Read 287 DQ Write 232 DQ Mixed 107 122% 209 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 106% Great: 124%
Seagate Desktop SSHD 4TB-$230 19,674 User benchmarks, average bench 73% 2TB free Firmware: CC44 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 107 92 13405664 (03) Spinup time 93 91 0 (04) Start/Stop count 99 99 1850 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 68 60 21504438921 (09) Power-on hours count 93 93 6556 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1269 (B7) Unknown 90 90 10 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 1 1 695 (BC) Unknown 100 99 4 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 68 47 555614240 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 502 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 91 91 19643 (C2) HDA temperature 32 53 77309411360 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 11 (F0) Head flying hours 100 253 124661425772329 (F1) Unknown 100 253 22396979220 (F2) Unknown 100 253 46581829423	92.2% Outstanding	Read 156 Write 164 Mixed 110 107% 143 MB/s	4K Read 0.73 4K Write 5.29 4K Mixed 0.79 216% 2.27 MB/s
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 92.2% Great: 94%
Toshiba DT01ACA200 2TB-$50 344,862 User benchmarks, average bench 86% 99GB free Firmware: MX4OABB0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (21^st percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 100 100 0 (03) Spinup time 149 149 17197564143 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 1606 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 6813 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 1272 (C0) Power-off retract count 99 99 1720 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 99 99 1720 (C2) HDA temperature 193 193 244814250015 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 1	72% Very good	Read 92.3 Write 158 Mixed 43.8 72% 98.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.94 4K Write 1.88 4K Mixed 0.2 96% 1.01 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 72% Great: 108%
Toshiba DT01ACA200 2TB-$50 344,862 User benchmarks, average bench 86% 2GB free Firmware: MX4O Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	28.9% Poor	Read 37.2 Write 63.4 Mixed 31.6 33% 44.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.56 4K Write 1.09 4K Mixed 0.2 66% 0.62 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 28.9% Great: 108%
WD Elements 25A2 1TB 31,808 User benchmarks, average bench 37% 524GB free, PID 25a2 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Performing as expected (40^th percentile)	33.7% Below average	Read 87.6 Write 90.3 Mixed 39.9 89% 72.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.19 4K Write 0.42 4K Mixed 0.1 18% 0.24 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 33.7% Great: 63%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL Aegis DDR4 3000 C16 2x8GB-$38 163,634 User benchmarks, average bench 82% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing below potential (1^st percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	40.6% Average	MC Read 14.1 MC Write 13.9 MC Mixed 12 38% 13.3 GB/s	SC Read 12.1 SC Write 12.8 SC Mixed 13.5 37% 12.8 GB/s	Latency 67.8 59% 67.8 ns
Poor: 62% ↑ This bench: 40.6% Great: 103%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Z370 Extreme4 Builds (Compare 3,383 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 94%

Nuclear submarine

Desktop 96%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 86%

Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asrock Z370 Extreme4 - $250

CPU
Core i7-8700KIntel $186Bench 88%, 746,287 samples	1,696x
Core i5-8600KIntel $173Bench 91%, 264,837 samples	838x
Core i7-8700Intel $200Bench 87%, 349,567 samples	172x

GPU
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	394x
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	335x
RTX 3080Nvidia $910Bench 187%, 424,051 samples	229x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $95Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	144x
860 Evo 1TBSamsung $130Bench 112%, 602,853 samples	125x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $109Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	124x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	219x
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $36Bench 84%, 287,720 samples	147x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	112x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 84% - Excellent

Total price: $974

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16