HP Presario V3000 (RZ600LA#ABM)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 18%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 26.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics0.04% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory3GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 3GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (41%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP Presario V3000 (RZ600LA#ABM)  (all builds)
MotherboardWistron 30B5
Memory0.9 GB free of 3 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1280 x 800 x 65536 colores
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20080602
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateFeb 23 '16 at 03:41
Run Duration152 Seconds
Run User COL-User
Background CPU 41%

 PC Performing below expectations (31st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Turion 64
U1, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 1 threads
Base clock 2 GHz
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
26.9% Poor
Memory 50.1
1-Core 27.5
2-Core 24.5
26% 34 Pts
4-Core 24.4
8-Core 22.4
3% 23.4 Pts
64-Core 26.3
2% 26.3 Pts
Poor: 27%
This bench: 26.9%
Great: 42%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce Go 6150
HP(103C 30B5) 64MB
Driver: nvd3dum.dll Ver. 7.15.11.7967
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
0.04% Terrible
Lighting 0.07
Reflection 0.15
Parallax 0.06
0% 0.09 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.04%
Great: 0%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD WD1200BEVS-60UST0 120GB
90GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 04.0
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
18.6% Very poor
Read 33.2
Write 31.6
Mixed 35.9
25% 33.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.29
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.21
47% 0.37 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 18.6%
Great: 29%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 3GB
null MHz
1024, 2048 MB
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
10.7% Very poor
MC Read 3.1
MC Write 3.9
MC Mixed 3
10% 3.33 GB/s
SC Read 2.6
SC Write 3.4
SC Mixed 2.6
8% 2.87 GB/s
Latency 160
25% 160 ns
Poor: 8%
This bench: 10.7%
Great: 23%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback