HP OMEN by HP Desktop PC 880-p0xx

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 24%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 20%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics26.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (74%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP OMEN by HP Desktop PC 880-p0xx  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 8308
Memory6.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180221
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateMar 27 '18 at 06:18
Run Duration421 Seconds
Run User ESP-User
Background CPU 74%

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-7400-$110
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
77.9% Very good
Memory 86.9
1-Core 9.4
2-Core 202
54% 99.4 Pts
4-Core 399
8-Core 397
53% 398 Pts
64-Core 395
24% 395 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 77.9%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-$101
HP(103C 8338) 2GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 388.73
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
26.7% Poor
Lighting 32.6
Reflection 23.9
Parallax 24.6
26% 27 fps
MRender 36.7
Gravity 32
Splatting 31.5
27% 33.4 fps
Poor: 24%
This bench: 26.7%
Great: 28%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$33
19GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HPH3 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
72.9% Very good
Read 127
Write 128
Mixed 118
93% 124 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 0.91
4K Mixed 0.25
62% 0.52 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 72.9%
Great: 112%
WD Elements 10B8 1.5TB
2GB free, PID 10b8
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
12.9% Very poor
Read 23.3
Write 29.9
Mixed 24.9
34% 26 MB/s
4K Read 0.41
4K Write 0.94
4K Mixed 0.19
40% 0.52 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 12.9%
Great: 43%
SDHC Card 32GB
1GB free, PID null
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
10.6% Very poor
Read 41.2
Write 6.54
Mixed 12
19% 19.9 MB/s
4K Read 4.37
4K Write 0.72
4K Mixed 0.32
52% 1.8 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 10.6%
Great: 33%
Kingston DataTraveler G3 8GB
0GB free, PID 1643
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
7.73% Terrible
Read 24.8
Write 7.43
Mixed 9.07
14% 13.8 MB/s
4K Read 7.36
4K Write 0.25
4K Mixed 0.09
39% 2.57 MB/s
Poor: 2%
This bench: 7.73%
Great: 8%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378A1K43CB2-CRC 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
75.4% Very good
MC Read 27.8
MC Write 30.3
MC Mixed 23.6
78% 27.2 GB/s
SC Read 14.8
SC Write 24.6
SC Mixed 22.2
59% 20.5 GB/s
Latency 70.6
57% 70.6 ns
Poor: 49%
This bench: 75.4%
Great: 88%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical OMEN by HP Desktop PC 880-p0xx Builds (Compare 1,302 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 65%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 55%
Yacht

System: HP OMEN by HP Desktop PC 880-p0xx

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 112% - Outstanding Total price: $299
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback