Notebook P95_HP

Performance Results


Gaming 40% Jet ski	Desktop 75% Battleship	Workstation 31% Sail boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	53.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	68.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

System	Notebook P95_HP (all builds)
Motherboard	Notebook P95_HP
Memory	12.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170803
Uptime	2.8 Days
Run Date	Mar 26 '18 at 12:15
Run Duration	86 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	13%

PC Performing as expected (59^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-7700HQ 473,208 User benchmarks, average bench 62% U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)	64.9% Good	Memory 89.4 1-Core 84.7 2-Core 144 65% 106 Pts	4-Core 237 8-Core 236 32% 236 Pts	64-Core 236 15% 236 Pts
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 64.9% Great: 73%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060 (Mobile) 177,775 User benchmarks, average bench 47% Clevo(1558 9501) ≥ 4GB Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 23.21.13.8875 Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	53.1% Above average	Lighting 64.2 Reflection 71.8 Parallax 57.7 52% 64.6 fps	MRender 71.3 Gravity 59.8 Splatting 68.4 55% 66.5 fps
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 53.1% Great: 52%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Crucial MX300 SATA M.2 525GB-$140 20,154 User benchmarks, average bench 85% 351GB free (System drive) Firmware: M0CR060 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 215 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 99 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AD) Unknown 100 100 8 (AE) Unknown 100 100 25 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 57 36 274879283243 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 1 (CA) Data Address Mark errors 100 100 0 (CE) Flying height 100 100 0 (F6) Unknown 100 100 5477420698 (F7) Unknown 100 100 171419159 (F8) Unknown 100 100 40337350 (B4) Unknown 0 0 1931 (D2) Unknown 100 100 0	68.3% Good	Read 480 Write 340 Mixed 339 86% 386 MB/s	4K Read 21.8 4K Write 54.8 4K Mixed 13.5 79% 30 MB/s	DQ Read 78.4 DQ Write 153 DQ Mixed 41.9 53% 91.2 MB/s
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 68.3% Great: 98%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial CT8G4SFS824A.M8FH 2x8GB 153 User benchmarks, average bench 73% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing above expectations (73^rd percentile)	75.8% Very good	MC Read 25.6 MC Write 31.3 MC Mixed 23.8 77% 26.9 GB/s	SC Read 15.5 SC Write 29.8 SC Mixed 22.4 64% 22.6 GB/s	Latency 68.1 59% 68.1 ns
Poor: 62% ↑ This bench: 75.8% Great: 81%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical P95_HP Builds (Compare 46 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 31%

Sail boat

Desktop 69%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 26%

Raft

System: Notebook P95_HP

CPU
Core i7-7700HQIntelBench 62%, 473,208 samples	44x
Core i7-7820HKIntelBench 72%, 18,903 samples	2x

GPU
GTX 1060 (Mobile)NvidiaBench 47%, 177,775 samples	29x
HD Graphics 630IntelBench 5%, 310,249 samples	17x

SSD
MX300 SATA M.2 525GBCrucial $140Bench 85%, 20,154 samples	12x
960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GBSamsung $45Bench 199%, 240,629 samples	4x
840 Pro 512GBSamsung $129Bench 96%, 14,996 samples	3x

RAM
CT16G4SFD824A.C16FHD 1x16GBCrucialBench 40%, 1,275 samples	11x
M471A1K43CB1-CRC 2x8GBSamsungBench 70%, 62,266 samples	4x
CT16G4SFD824A.C16FHD 2x16GBCrucialBench 74%, 808 samples	4x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 15% - Very poor

Total price: $140

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $131	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $186	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $34	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16