Fujitsu CELSIUS H920

Performance Results


Gaming 11% Tree trunk	Desktop 68% Battle cruiser	Workstation 10% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	8.75% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	79.7% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

System	Fujitsu CELSIUS H920 (all builds)
Motherboard	FUJITSU FJNB242
Memory	26.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170530
Uptime	2 Days
Run Date	Mar 25 '18 at 15:03
Run Duration	147 Seconds
Run User	FIN-User
Background CPU	1%

PC Performing below expectations (40^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-3920XM 797 User benchmarks, average bench 68% Onboard, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (36^th percentile)	67.2% Good	Memory 76.3 1-Core 102 2-Core 194 70% 124 Pts	4-Core 316 8-Core 441 48% 379 Pts	64-Core 433 27% 433 Pts
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 67.2% Great: 80%

Graphics Cards	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz) 409,110 User benchmarks, average bench 3% Fujitsu(10CF 16C1) 2GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4358 Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	4.06% Terrible	Lighting 4.47 Reflection 11.6 Parallax 3.03 4% 6.37 fps	MRender 6.05 Gravity 2.47 Splatting 8.43 5% 5.65 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 4.06% Great: 4%
Nvidia Quadro K4000M 631 User benchmarks, average bench 12% Fujitsu(10CF 1761) ≥ 4GB CLim: 601 MHz, MLim: 700 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 390.65 Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	8.75% Terrible	Lighting 7.63 Reflection 12.4 Parallax 16.7 6% 12.3 fps	MRender 17.3 Gravity 16.6 Splatting 16.3 14% 16.8 fps
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 8.75% Great: 12%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Pro 1TB-$210 25,365 User benchmarks, average bench 105% 573GB free (System drive) Firmware: EXM0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 96 96 15304 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 721 (B1) Unknown 99 99 43 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 61 49 39 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 26 (F1) Unknown 99 99 46495006920	79.7% Very good	Read 499 Write 485 Mixed 507 111% 497 MB/s	4K Read 21.1 4K Write 46.6 4K Mixed 18 80% 28.6 MB/s	DQ Read 25.3 DQ Write 251 DQ Mixed 17.4 49% 97.9 MB/s
Poor: 77% ↑ This bench: 79.7% Great: 124%
Samsung 850 Pro 512GB-$210 68,849 User benchmarks, average bench 102% 273GB free Firmware: EXM0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 96 96 15365 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 726 (B1) Unknown 99 99 2 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 65 56 35 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 25 (F1) Unknown 99 99 1437721066	75.8% Very good	Read 501 Write 485 Mixed 504 111% 496 MB/s	4K Read 23.3 4K Write 41.4 4K Mixed 18 80% 27.6 MB/s	DQ Read 23.3 DQ Write 67.7 DQ Mixed 17.1 21% 36 MB/s
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 75.8% Great: 124%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471B1G73BH0-CK0 4x8GB 290 User benchmarks, average bench 52% 4 of 4 slots used 32GB SODIMM DDR3 1600 MHz Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile)	55.1% Above average	MC Read 21.1 MC Write 19.4 MC Mixed 17 55% 19.2 GB/s	SC Read 16.3 SC Write 18.1 SC Mixed 19.2 51% 17.9 GB/s	Latency 87.8 46% 87.8 ns
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 55.1% Great: 56%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical CELSIUS H920 Builds (Compare 24 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 8%

Tree trunk

Desktop 61%

Destroyer

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

System: Fujitsu CELSIUS H920

CPU
Core i7-3720QMIntel $100Bench 65%, 9,911 samples	9x
Core i7-3610QMIntel $300Bench 62%, 38,575 samples	6x
Core i7-3820QMIntel $275Bench 66%, 3,135 samples	3x

GPU
HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 409,110 samples	16x
Quadro K3000MNvidiaBench 8%, 2,310 samples	6x
Quadro K4000MNvidiaBench 12%, 631 samples	2x

SSD
SKC600512G 512GBKingstonBench 109%, 5,390 samples	6x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	4x
C400 RealSSD 256GBMicronBench 55%, 11,652 samples	2x

RAM
HMT325S6CFR8A-PB 4x2GBHynixBench 53%, 12 samples	3x
M471B1G73EB0-YK0 M471B5173DB0-YK0 M471B5173EB0-YK0 16GBSamsungBench 30%, 3 samples	3x
M471B5173QH0-YK0 4x4GBSamsungBench 53%, 1,523 samples	2x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 86% - Excellent

Total price: $100

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $179	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16