ADD TO PC
BUILD

1e657 1E657A74

Performance Results


Gaming 10% Tree trunk	Desktop 67% Battle cruiser	Workstation 9% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	8.17% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	61.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Run History

8 years ago, 8 years ago.

System	1e657 1E657A74 (all builds)
Motherboard	EVGA EVGA P55 SLI E657
Memory	4.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 0 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20110503
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Feb 22 '16 at 04:09
Run Duration	309 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	0%

PC Performing as expected (55^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7 860-$339 51,451 User benchmarks, average bench 64% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.8 GHz Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	70.3% Very good	Memory 96 1-Core 70.4 2-Core 141 64% 102 Pts	4-Core 244 8-Core 357 38% 300 Pts	64-Core 360 22% 360 Pts
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 70.3% Great: 72%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 260-$250 11,945 User benchmarks, average bench 7% Device(0000 0000) 896MB Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 9.18.13.4192 Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile)	8.17% Terrible	Lighting 11 Reflection 9 Parallax 4.03 9% 8 fps	MRender 9.33 Gravity 9.03 Splatting 6.74 7% 8.37 fps
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 8.17% Great: 9%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 144GB free Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 142 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 116 (B1) Unknown 99 99 1 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 68 59 32 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 7 (F1) Unknown 99 99 1128597636
Poor: 72% Great: 124%
OCZ Vertex 4 128GB-$215 19,372 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 68GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1.5 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below potential (4^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 6 0 6 (03) Spinup time 100 100 0 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 0 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 3275 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 3908 (E8) Unknown 100 100 13200323977 (E9) Unknown 99 0 99	61.4% Good	Read 268 Write 258 Mixed 244 57% 257 MB/s	4K Read 16.6 4K Write 50.5 4K Mixed 27 86% 31.4 MB/s	DQ Read 168 DQ Write 182 DQ Mixed 92.4 92% 148 MB/s
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 61.4% Great: 104%
OCZ VERTEX-TURBO 64GB 124 User benchmarks, average bench 28% 16GB free Firmware: 1.7 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing below expectations (40^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 6 0 0 (09) Power-on hours count 60 19 0 (0C) Power cycle count 195 25 0 (B8) Unknown 21 0 0 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 0 0 0 (C4) Reallocation count 0 0 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 0 0 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 50 138 118431 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 61 23 46609 (C8) Write error rate 246 190 2397 (C9) Soft read error rate 80 51 1024 (CA) Data Address Mark errors 228 220 87 (CB) Run out cancel 208 230 78 (CC) Soft ECC correction 0 0 0 (CD) Thermal asperity rate(TAR) 136 19 0 (CE) Flying height 21 0 0 (CF) Spin high current 30 12 0 (D0) Spin buzz 169 4 0 (D1) Offline seek performance 77 0 0 (D3) Unknown 0 0 0 (D4) Unknown 0 0 0 (D5) Unknown 0 0 0	26.9% Poor	Read 194 Write 102 Mixed 120 30% 139 MB/s	4K Read 17.8 4K Write 8.65 4K Mixed 6.17 39% 10.9 MB/s	DQ Read 62.6 DQ Write 8.96 DQ Mixed 5.8 12% 25.8 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 26.9% Great: 36%
WD Black 500GB (2008)-$95 28,095 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 367GB free Firmware: 05.00K05 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing as expected (46^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 228 227 8575 (04) Start/Stop count 89 89 11530 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 253 0 (09) Power-on hours count 90 90 7842 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 94 94 6733 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 285 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 197 197 11528 (C2) HDA temperature 116 110 34 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	44.6% Average	Read 80.1 Write 74.7 Mixed 56.1 52% 70.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.72 4K Write 2.42 4K Mixed 0.51 132% 1.22 MB/s
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 44.6% Great: 69%
PNY USB 2.0 FD 8GB 270 User benchmarks, average bench 6% 7GB free, PID 0048, PNY ATTACHE 8GB Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing below expectations (34^th percentile)	5.08% Terrible	Read 20.6 Write 6.41 Mixed 10.8 14% 12.6 MB/s	4K Read 2.79 4K Write 0.01 4K Mixed 0.01 11% 0.94 MB/s
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 5.08% Great: 7%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 8GB 82,857 User benchmarks, average bench 34% 0, 0, 0, 0 MHz 2048, 2048, 2048, 2048 MB Performing above expectations (84^th percentile)	42.5% Average	MC Read 16.7 MC Write 13.9 MC Mixed 11.6 40% 14.1 GB/s	SC Read 10.1 SC Write 13.2 SC Mixed 10 32% 11.1 GB/s	Latency 54 74% 54 ns
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 42.5% Great: 51%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

The Best.

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback