Asus RAMPAGE V EXTREME

Performance Results


Gaming 132% UFO	Desktop 94% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 118% UFO


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 90.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	144% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	207% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asus RAMPAGE V EXTREME (all builds)
Memory	24.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170331
Uptime	0.2 Days
Run Date	Mar 24 '18 at 16:38
Run Duration	171 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	13%

PC Performing as expected (55^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-5930K-$70 34,039 User benchmarks, average bench 80% SOCKET 2011, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	90.1% Outstanding	Memory 93.8 1-Core 119 2-Core 231 84% 148 Pts	4-Core 465 8-Core 745 74% 605 Pts	64-Core 912 56% 912 Pts
Poor: 70% ↑ This bench: 90.1% Great: 91%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia Titan V 869 User benchmarks, average bench 140% Nvidia(10DE 1218) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1912 MHz, MLim: 425 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 391.24 Performing below potential (55^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	144% Outstanding	Lighting 204 Reflection 199 Parallax 275 167% 226 fps	MRender 191 Gravity 222 Splatting 98 132% 170 fps
Poor: 113% ↑ This bench: 144% Great: 155%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43 165,668 User benchmarks, average bench 213% 120GB free (System drive) Firmware: 3B7QCXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Performing below expectations (39^th percentile)	207% Outstanding	Read 1,897 Write 1,327 Mixed 1,183 325% 1,469 MB/s	4K Read 34.3 4K Write 85.6 4K Mixed 37.7 146% 52.5 MB/s	DQ Read 37.8 DQ Write 232 DQ Mixed 22.7 50% 97.4 MB/s
Poor: 153% ↑ This bench: 207% Great: 254%
Toshiba X300 4TB-$146 23,740 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 687GB free Firmware: FP2A Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 100 100 0 (03) Spinup time 100 100 7034 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 1291 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 92 92 3364 (0A) Spinup retry count 125 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 892 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 306 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 334 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 100 100 1515 (C2) HDA temperature 100 100 270583922742 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 253 0 (DC) Disk shift 100 100 0 (DE) Loaded hours 93 93 3067 (DF) Load/unload retry count 100 100 0 (E0) Load friction 100 100 0 (E2) Load-in time 100 100 208 (F0) Head flying hours 100 100 0	68.3% Good	Read 118 Write 120 Mixed 117 89% 118 MB/s	4K Read 1.5 4K Write 1.92 4K Mixed 0.24 125% 1.22 MB/s
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 68.3% Great: 104%
Seagate BUP Slim BK 1TB 18,390 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 416GB free Firmware: 0302 Performing below expectations (27^th percentile)	22.6% Poor	Read 36.9 Write 41.1 Mixed 38.5 29% 38.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.49 4K Write 1.97 4K Mixed 0.37 98% 0.94 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 22.6% Great: 63%
Seagate ST3250410AS 250GB-$95 20,246 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 232GB free Firmware: 3.AAC Max speed: SATA 1.0 150 MB/s Performing above expectations (78^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 117 76 141184755 (03) Spinup time 97 97 0 (04) Start/Stop count 96 96 4891 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 84 60 277975583 (09) Power-on hours count 91 91 7937 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 2621 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 49 47 891093043 (C2) HDA temperature 51 53 47244640307 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 91 56 134906961 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 100 253 0 (CA) Data Address Mark errors 100 253 0	48.3% Average	Read 81.3 Write 87 Mixed 78.7 62% 82.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.74 4K Write 1.37 4K Mixed 0.39 99% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 48.3% Great: 54%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair Dominator DDR4 2800 C16 8x4GB 223 User benchmarks, average bench 113% 8 of 8 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 2400 MHz clocked @ 2800 MHz Performing above expectations (73^rd percentile)	119% Outstanding	MC Read 47 MC Write 43.6 MC Mixed 48.1 132% 46.2 GB/s	SC Read 16.6 SC Write 21.7 SC Mixed 23.1 58% 20.5 GB/s	Latency 60.2 66% 60.2 ns
Poor: 94% ↑ This bench: 119% Great: 138%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical RAMPAGE V EXTREME Builds (Compare 2,057 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 101%

UFO

Desktop 84%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 90%

Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asus RAMPAGE V EXTREME - $122

CPU
Core i7-5930KIntel $70Bench 80%, 34,039 samples	559x
Core i7-5820KIntel $130Bench 77%, 101,694 samples	527x
Core i7-5960XIntel $285Bench 80%, 15,468 samples	470x

GPU
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	216x
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	199x
GTX 980Nvidia $500Bench 59%, 167,107 samples	123x

SSD
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $109Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	79x
950 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBSamsung $625Bench 223%, 54,978 samples	61x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $95Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	60x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 2666 C16 4x8GBCorsair $98Bench 85%, 8,498 samples	36x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 2800 C16 4x4GBCorsair $210Bench 88%, 3,970 samples	34x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 2666 C16 4x4GBCorsair $115Bench 88%, 5,380 samples	28x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 71% - Very good

Total price: $884

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $274	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16