Asus MAXIMUS IX FORMULA

Performance Results


Gaming 117% UFO	Desktop 104% UFO	Workstation 101% UFO


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 101%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics	113% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	186% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

Motherboard	Asus MAXIMUS IX FORMULA (all builds)
Memory	28.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kolorów
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20171225
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Mar 23 '18 at 19:28
Run Duration	158 Seconds
Run User	POL-User
Background CPU	8%

Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (68^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-7700K-$250 712,312 User benchmarks, average bench 84% LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.75 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	101% Outstanding	Memory 97.6 1-Core 152 2-Core 302 101% 184 Pts	4-Core 560 8-Core 844 87% 702 Pts	64-Core 838 52% 838 Pts
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 101% Great: 92%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$400 1,082,454 User benchmarks, average bench 102% Gigabyte(1458 370F) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2062 MHz, MLim: 2551 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 391.24 Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	113% Outstanding	Lighting 151 Reflection 157 Parallax 137 123% 148 fps	MRender 122 Gravity 149 Splatting 115 104% 129 fps
Poor: 93% ↑ This bench: 113% Great: 110%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Plextor M8Pe NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$149 2,380 User benchmarks, average bench 196% 476GB free Firmware: 1.06 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)	156% Outstanding	Read 1,322 Write 813 Mixed 882 222% 1,006 MB/s	4K Read 30.4 4K Write 77.3 4K Mixed 38 136% 48.6 MB/s	DQ Read 352 DQ Write 189 DQ Mixed 110 125% 217 MB/s
Poor: 128% ↑ This bench: 156% Great: 237%
Plextor M8Pe NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$149 2,380 User benchmarks, average bench 196% 392GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1.06 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile)	186% Outstanding	Read 2,054 Write 837 Mixed 900 276% 1,264 MB/s	4K Read 31.1 4K Write 76.7 4K Mixed 38 136% 48.6 MB/s	DQ Read 337 DQ Write 162 DQ Mixed 101 115% 200 MB/s
Poor: 128% ↑ This bench: 186% Great: 237%
Toshiba X300 4TB-$146 23,740 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 3.5TB free Firmware: FP2A Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 100 100 0 (03) Spinup time 100 100 6914 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 4234 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 92 92 3474 (0A) Spinup retry count 184 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 2306 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 854 (C0) Power-off retract count 99 99 874 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 100 100 4835 (C2) HDA temperature 100 100 219044511777 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 253 0 (DC) Disk shift 100 100 0 (DE) Loaded hours 95 95 2139 (DF) Load/unload retry count 100 100 0 (E0) Load friction 100 100 0 (E2) Load-in time 100 100 546 (F0) Head flying hours 100 100 0
Poor: 57% Great: 104%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.10 320GB-$80 31,610 User benchmarks, average bench 34% 294GB free Firmware: 3.AAJ Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 117 91 131066741 (03) Spinup time 95 95 0 (04) Start/Stop count 95 95 6052 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 84 60 329924524 (09) Power-on hours count 92 92 7808 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 95 95 5704 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 65 45 588972067 (C2) HDA temperature 35 55 77309411363 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 84 57 119063794 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 14 (C8) Write error rate 100 253 0 (CA) Data Address Mark errors 99 252 1	45.3% Average	Read 77.9 Write 79.7 Mixed 68.4 56% 75.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.66 4K Write 1.16 4K Mixed 0.39 93% 0.74 MB/s
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 45.3% Great: 43%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C14 4x8GB 1,459 User benchmarks, average bench 105% 4 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz Performing above expectations (66^th percentile)	108% Outstanding	MC Read 39.7 MC Write 40.5 MC Mixed 33.2 108% 37.8 GB/s	SC Read 24.1 SC Write 44.5 SC Mixed 33.3 97% 34 GB/s	Latency 48 83% 48 ns
Poor: 69% ↑ This bench: 108% Great: 144%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical MAXIMUS IX FORMULA Builds (Compare 1,520 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 106%

UFO

Desktop 90%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 91%

Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: Asus MAXIMUS IX FORMULA - $378

CPU
Core i7-7700KIntel $250Bench 84%, 712,312 samples	1,153x
Core i7-6700KIntel $180Bench 81%, 588,978 samples	177x
Core i7-7700k VHIntelBench 84%, 9,708 samples	79x

GPU
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	339x
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	233x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	90x

SSD
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $109Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	67x
960 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBSamsung $139Bench 266%, 63,520 samples	62x
960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 213%, 165,668 samples	57x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GBCorsairBench 93%, 89,024 samples	81x
Trident Z DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GBG.SKILL $113Bench 91%, 87,239 samples	56x
Trident Z RGB DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $55Bench 84%, 215,644 samples	52x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 63% - Good

Total price: $1,222

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16