Asus ROG MAXIMUS X HERO

Performance Results


Gaming 119% UFO	Desktop 94% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 111% UFO


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 92.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	129% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus ROG MAXIMUS X HERO (all builds)
Memory	17.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit couleurs
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20171221
Uptime	7.4 Days
Run Date	Mar 22 '18 at 21:10
Run Duration	495 Seconds
Run User	FRA-User
Background CPU	12%

PC Performing above expectations (62^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-8700K-$186 746,287 User benchmarks, average bench 88% LGA1151, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	92.4% Outstanding	Memory 92.3 1-Core 136 2-Core 269 92% 166 Pts	4-Core 497 8-Core 831 81% 664 Pts	64-Core 1,100 68% 1,100 Pts
Poor: 76% ↑ This bench: 92.4% Great: 100%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485 840,268 User benchmarks, average bench 124% Gigabyte(1458 374C) ≥ 4GB; Gigabyte G1 Gaming CLim: 2037 MHz, MLim: 3002 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 391.1 Performing above expectations (80^th percentile)	129% Outstanding	Lighting 179 Reflection 202 Parallax 208 146% 196 fps	MRender 121 Gravity 183 Splatting 130 117% 145 fps
Poor: 109% ↑ This bench: 129% Great: 133%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 500GB-$150 68,337 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 99GB free Firmware: EXT0DB6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 96 96 19395 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1009 (B1) Unknown 97 97 25 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 56 47 44 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 99 99 3 (EB) Unknown 99 99 613 (F1) Unknown 99 99 21176777466	92.1% Outstanding	Read 507 Write 349 Mixed 353 89% 403 MB/s	4K Read 40.5 4K Write 57.8 4K Mixed 27.1 127% 41.8 MB/s	DQ Read 351 DQ Write 223 DQ Mixed 87.3 119% 220 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 92.1% Great: 126%
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$95 217,115 User benchmarks, average bench 96% 69GB free (System drive) Firmware: EXT0DB6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 95 95 22511 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 1209 (B1) Unknown 95 95 60 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 63 30 37 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 99 99 1 (EB) Unknown 99 99 778 (F1) Unknown 99 99 42703504228
Poor: 64% Great: 118%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$50 815,515 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 1TB free Firmware: CC26 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (51^st percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 114 99 83321880 (03) Spinup time 97 96 0 (04) Start/Stop count 98 98 2999 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 72 60 19503955 (09) Power-on hours count 83 83 15008 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 801 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 96 96 4 (BE) vendor-specific 68 34 52321896693792 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 288 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 69 69 62548 (C2) HDA temperature 32 66 64424509472 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (F0) Head flying hours 100 253 -13473312399921 (F1) Unknown 100 253 29199485939 (F2) Unknown 100 253 14589326197	91.4% Outstanding	Read 167 Write 152 Mixed 160 120% 160 MB/s	4K Read 0.51 4K Write 1.42 4K Mixed 0.23 73% 0.72 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 91.4% Great: 114%
WD Black 1TB (2010)-$40 257,835 User benchmarks, average bench 57% 442GB free Firmware: 05.01D05 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 172 167 4358 (04) Start/Stop count 94 94 6263 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 61 61 28476 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1550 (C0) Power-off retract count 199 199 973 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 199 199 5289 (C2) HDA temperature 107 73 40 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	72.3% Very good	Read 144 Write 108 Mixed 114 92% 122 MB/s	4K Read 0.54 4K Write 2.12 4K Mixed 0.38 104% 1.01 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 72.3% Great: 76%
Samsung M3 Portable 1TB 17,632 User benchmarks, average bench 27% 256GB free, PID 61b6 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Performing above expectations (76^th percentile)	35.2% Below average	Read 76.2 Write 85.2 Mixed 80 105% 80.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.31 4K Write 1.81 4K Mixed 0.33 74% 0.82 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 35.2% Great: 42%
USB DISK 2.0 8GB 1,435 User benchmarks, average bench 5% 2GB free, PID 3e00 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing below expectations (27^th percentile)	3.27% Terrible	Read 11.7 Write 2.68 Mixed 4.43 6% 6.28 MB/s	4K Read 4.07 4K Write 0.008 4K Mixed 0.01 16% 1.36 MB/s
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 3.27% Great: 7%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 2400 C14 4x8GB 4,792 User benchmarks, average bench 79% 4 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing above expectations (70^th percentile)	79.3% Very good	MC Read 29 MC Write 30.1 MC Mixed 24.1 79% 27.7 GB/s	SC Read 18.8 SC Write 32.2 SC Mixed 25.2 73% 25.4 GB/s	Latency 63.5 63% 63.5 ns
Poor: 66% ↑ This bench: 79.3% Great: 106%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical ROG MAXIMUS X HERO Builds (Compare 3,649 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 112%

UFO

Desktop 96%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 103%

UFO

Motherboard: Asus ROG MAXIMUS X HERO - $250

CPU
Core i7-8700KIntel $186Bench 88%, 746,287 samples	2,386x
Core i9-9900KIntel $410Bench 98%, 354,223 samples	298x
Core i7-8086KIntel $399Bench 91%, 38,086 samples	250x

GPU
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	686x
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	336x
RTX 3080Nvidia $625Bench 187%, 424,051 samples	229x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $90Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	199x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 273%, 381,216 samples	183x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $158Bench 297%, 331,647 samples	177x

RAM
Trident Z DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GBG.SKILL $113Bench 91%, 87,239 samples	145x
Trident Z RGB DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $55Bench 84%, 215,644 samples	115x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	112x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 84% - Excellent

Total price: $1,124

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16