Asrock N68-S

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 30%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 26.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics3.01% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive27.7% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
MotherboardAsrock N68-S  (all builds)
Memory2.7 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20090309
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateMar 22 '18 at 02:27
Run Duration473 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing below expectations (29th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Athlon 64 X2 Dual Core 5200+
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
26.7% Poor
Memory 39.9
1-Core 37.8
2-Core 79.9
31% 52.5 Pts
4-Core 79.4
8-Core 79
11% 79.2 Pts
64-Core 81.5
5% 81.5 Pts
Poor: 24%
This bench: 26.7%
Great: 45%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 630
Zotac(19DA 6199) 2GB
Ram: 2GB, Driver: 327.23
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
3.01% Terrible
Lighting 4.1
Reflection 4.88
Parallax 3.34
3% 4.11 fps
MRender 5.52
Gravity 0.13
Splatting 3.13
2% 2.93 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.01%
Great: 5%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$28
136GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFK
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
27.7% Poor
Read 176
Write 109
Mixed 158
33% 148 MB/s
4K Read 17.7
4K Write 17
4K Mixed 5.76
43% 13.5 MB/s
DQ Read 29.5
DQ Write 46.5
DQ Mixed 6.8
14% 27.6 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 27.7%
Great: 100%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 250GB-$33
232GB free
Firmware: CC38
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
73% Very good
Read 128
Write 126
Mixed 123
95% 126 MB/s
4K Read 0.64
4K Write 1.89
4K Mixed 0.5
117% 1.01 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 73%
Great: 68%
Samsung M3 Portable 1TB
428GB free, PID 61b6
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
12.8% Very poor
Read 21.7
Write 22.3
Mixed 21.7
28% 21.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.39
4K Write 1.52
4K Mixed 0.26
62% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 12.8%
Great: 42%
Sony Flash Disk 32GB
8GB free, PID 05ba
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
2.59% Terrible
Read 7.07
Write 3.31
Mixed 2.2
4% 4.19 MB/s
4K Read 3.56
4K Write 0.002
4K Mixed 0
13% 1.19 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 2.59%
Great: 7%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x2GB
2 of 2 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR2
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
18.3% Very poor
MC Read 6.9
MC Write 6.9
MC Mixed 4.4
17% 6.07 GB/s
SC Read 6.1
SC Write 7.5
SC Mixed 6
19% 6.53 GB/s
Latency 203
20% 203 ns
Poor: 10%
This bench: 18.3%
Great: 44%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical N68-S Builds (Compare 53 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 39%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock N68-S

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $15Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback