Asrock Q1900M

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 1% Tree trunk	Desktop 30% Sail boat	Workstation 1% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 35.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	2.82% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (61%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago.

Motherboard	Asrock Q1900M (all builds)
Memory	5.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20161108
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Mar 21 '18 at 19:24
Run Duration	112 Seconds
Run User	HRV-User
Background CPU	61%

PC Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Celeron J1900 6,116 User benchmarks, average bench 34% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (55^th percentile)	35.2% Below average	Memory 55.7 1-Core 22.9 2-Core 45.7 29% 41.4 Pts	4-Core 88.4 8-Core 86.7 12% 87.6 Pts	64-Core 83.1 5% 83.1 Pts
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 35.2% Great: 40%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 9600 GSO 1,167 User benchmarks, average bench 5% POV(1ACC 0905) 384MB Ram: 384MB, Driver: 342.1 Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	2.82% Terrible	Lighting 3.93 Reflection 2.12 Parallax 2.22 3% 2.76 fps	MRender 1.48 Gravity 4.83 Splatting 1.52 2% 2.61 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 2.82% Great: 6%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Seagate ST3160812AS 160GB-$47 10,399 User benchmarks, average bench 30% 62GB free (System drive) Firmware: 3.AAH Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing as expected (45^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 111 88 33961769 (03) Spinup time 94 94 0 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 903 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 61 54 107404886135 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 456 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 96 96 4969 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 58 54 723255338 (C2) HDA temperature 42 46 77309411370 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 57 46 156216924 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 195 12 (C8) Write error rate 100 253 0 (CA) Data Address Mark errors 100 253 0	29.3% Poor	Read 52.2 Write 49.7 Mixed 53.7 39% 51.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.37 4K Write 0.91 4K Mixed 0.16 50% 0.48 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 29.3% Great: 40%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingmax FLFF65F-C8KM9 Kingston 99P5474-014.A00LF 8GB 13 User benchmarks, average bench 26% 1333, 1333 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Performing below potential (23^rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	24.7% Poor	MC Read 8.6 MC Write 8.9 MC Mixed 10.1 26% 9.2 GB/s	SC Read 2.4 SC Write 4.8 SC Mixed 4.6 11% 3.93 GB/s	Latency 141 28% 141 ns
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 24.7% Great: 27%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Q1900M Builds (Compare 201 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 4%

Tree trunk

Desktop 32%

Sail boat

Workstation 4%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock Q1900M

CPU
Celeron J1900IntelBench 34%, 6,116 samples	191x
Celeron J1900IntelBench 36%, 507 samples	10x

GPU
HD Graphics (Bay Trail 0.667 - 0.854 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 90,156 samples	131x
R7 240AMDBench 5%, 58,337 samples	8x
GeForce GT 710NvidiaBench 3%, 187,161 samples	8x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	12x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	4x
A400 120GBKingston $32Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	4x

RAM
TEAMGROUP-UD3-1600 1x8GBUnknownBench 27%, 3,584 samples	19x
1x8GBUnknownBench 38%, 168,538 samples	10x
TEAMGROUP-UD3-1600 2x8GBUnknownBench 52%, 6,864 samples	8x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 21% - Poor

Total price: $28

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16