Asus K30BF_M32BF_A_F_K31BF

Performance Results


Gaming 35% Sail boat	Desktop 63% Destroyer	Workstation 26% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 53%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	63% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	33% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago.

System	Asus K30BF_M32BF_A_F_K31BF (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK K30BF_M32BF_A_F_K31BF
Memory	12.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	5180 x 1050 - 32 Bit couleurs
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20150731
Uptime	1.1 Days
Run Date	Mar 21 '18 at 16:09
Run Duration	205 Seconds
Run User	FRA-User
Background CPU	10%

Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Athlon X4 880K-$105 8,721 User benchmarks, average bench 46% FM2+ , 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile)	53% Above average	Memory 71 1-Core 68.8 2-Core 130 54% 89.8 Pts	4-Core 205 8-Core 206 27% 206 Pts	64-Core 206 13% 206 Pts
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 53% Great: 55%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117 1,368,019 User benchmarks, average bench 56% MSI(1462 3281) CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 391.24 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	63% Good	Lighting 80.6 Reflection 77.1 Parallax 74.3 66% 77.3 fps	MRender 69 Gravity 69.4 Splatting 72.6 58% 70.3 fps
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 63% Great: 60%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 129GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below potential (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 2187 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 698 (B1) Unknown 99 99 19 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 63 46 37 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 246 (F1) Unknown 99 99 8565216115	33% Below average	Read 267 Write 146 Mixed 177 43% 196 MB/s	4K Read 31.2 4K Write 1.52 4K Mixed 1.53 50% 11.4 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 33% Great: 124%
WD Blue 4TB (2015)-$85 124,615 User benchmarks, average bench 80% 842GB free Firmware: 80.00A80 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 179 175 8016 (04) Start/Stop count 99 99 1469 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 98 98 2115 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 651 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 199 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 192 192 24728 (C2) HDA temperature 116 97 36 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	47.4% Average	Read 89 Write 76 Mixed 86.8 63% 83.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.62 4K Write 1.69 4K Mixed 0.21 80% 0.84 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 47.4% Great: 101%
Toshiba E300 3TB-$116 1,216 User benchmarks, average bench 69% 702GB free Firmware: MZ6OACF0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (42^nd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 144 144 84 (03) Spinup time 135 135 34386542997 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 2560 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 138 138 33 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 9525 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 1192 (C0) Power-off retract count 98 98 2560 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 98 98 2560 (C2) HDA temperature 176 176 210454511650 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0	67% Good	Read 130 Write 103 Mixed 131 92% 121 MB/s	4K Read 0.49 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.14 66% 0.74 MB/s
Poor: 45% ↑ This bench: 67% Great: 87%
Toshiba DT01ACA300 3TB-$80 85,620 User benchmarks, average bench 85% 117GB free Firmware: MX6OABS0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (38^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 140 140 68 (03) Spinup time 143 143 34384839075 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 2836 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 124 124 33 (09) Power-on hours count 98 98 20211 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 2244 (C0) Power-off retract count 98 98 2838 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 98 98 2838 (C2) HDA temperature 171 171 210454380579 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0	79.9% Very good	Read 160 Write 119 Mixed 158 110% 145 MB/s	4K Read 0.69 4K Write 1.89 4K Mixed 0.2 86% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 79.9% Great: 107%
PI-477 External USB3.0 1TB 6 User benchmarks, average bench 24% 8GB free, PID 2028 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)	16.3% Very poor	Read 45.5 Write 40.2 Mixed 37.5 52% 41.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.35 4K Write 0.28 4K Mixed 0.12 15% 0.25 MB/s
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 16.3% Great: 35%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair Vengeance DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GB 16,567 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing below potential (10^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	37.6% Below average	MC Read 15.8 MC Write 9.1 MC Mixed 15.7 39% 13.5 GB/s	SC Read 7.9 SC Write 7.6 SC Mixed 10.2 24% 8.57 GB/s	Latency 99.2 40% 99.2 ns
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 37.6% Great: 62%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical K30BF_M32BF_A_F_K31BF Builds (Compare 77 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 7%

Tree trunk

Desktop 50%

Yacht

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

System: Asus K30BF_M32BF_A_F_K31BF

CPU
A10-6700 APU (2013 D.Ri)AMD $130Bench 50%, 12,547 samples	22x
A8-5500 APUAMD $135Bench 48%, 10,478 samples	20x
A8-6500 APUAMD $135Bench 50%, 7,219 samples	11x

GPU
Radeon HD 7560DAMDBench 4%, 10,029 samples	10x
Radeon R7 GraphicsAMDBench 6%, 25,284 samples	8x
Radeon HD 8670DAMDBench 5%, 5,822 samples	7x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	4x
SHGS31-500GS-2 500GBBench 91%, 9,480 samples	3x
A400 120GBKingston $29Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	2x

RAM
M378B5173DB0-CK0 2x4GBSamsungBench 51%, 14,844 samples	6x
M378B1G73DB0-CK0 1x8GBSamsungBench 30%, 12,268 samples	4x
M378B1G73EB0-CK0 2x8GBSamsungBench 52%, 3,888 samples	3x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 54% - Above average

Total price: $158

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16