Gigabyte GA-EX58-UD5

Performance Results


Gaming 14% Tree trunk	Desktop 63% Destroyer	Workstation 11% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (17th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 83 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 55.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	20% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	24.2% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory	10GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 10GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (67%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-EX58-UD5 (all builds)
Memory	5.4 GB free of 10 GB @ 0.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20100311
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Mar 18 '18 at 22:15
Run Duration	462 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	67%

PC Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-950-$100 36,389 User benchmarks, average bench 66% Socket 1366, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.05 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	55.3% Above average	Memory 81.9 1-Core 52.2 2-Core 109 51% 80.9 Pts	4-Core 180 8-Core 113 21% 146 Pts	64-Core 223 14% 223 Pts
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 55.3% Great: 74%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-$101 269,381 User benchmarks, average bench 26% EVGA(3842 6150) CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 391.1 Relative performance (0^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	20% Poor	Lighting 23.1 Reflection 20.4 Parallax 28.4 19% 24 fps	MRender 29.7 Gravity 21.6 Splatting 29.5 22% 26.9 fps
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 20% Great: 28%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 120GB-$85 104,444 User benchmarks, average bench 91% 17GB free (System drive) Firmware: EXT0DB6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below potential (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 98 98 9453 (0C) Power cycle count 96 96 3679 (B1) Unknown 93 93 81 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 61 53 39 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 81 (F1) Unknown 99 99 22514119454	24.2% Poor	Read 258 Write 175 Mixed 117 40% 183 MB/s	4K Read 4.16 4K Write 3.24 4K Mixed 2.13 11% 3.17 MB/s
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 24.2% Great: 108%
WD Blue 320GB (2008)-$39 64,707 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 72GB free Firmware: 05.01D05 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing below expectations (29^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 1243 (03) Spinup time 139 138 4041 (04) Start/Stop count 91 91 9339 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 81 81 14472 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 96 96 4874 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 232 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 197 197 9106 (C2) HDA temperature 104 91 39 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 1 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 1 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 1	38.3% Below average	Read 66.6 Write 66.8 Mixed 63.9 50% 65.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.69 4K Write 1.08 4K Mixed 0.37 90% 0.71 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 38.3% Great: 60%
Hitachi HDT725025VLA380 250GB-$132 6,580 User benchmarks, average bench 27% 56GB free Firmware: V5DOA73A Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing as expected (44^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 100 100 0 (03) Spinup time 113 113 25791430985 (04) Start/Stop count 97 97 12183 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 96 96 32155 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 7507 (C0) Power-off retract count 90 90 13018 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 90 90 13018 (C2) HDA temperature 157 157 244813463590 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 253 1	25.7% Poor	Read 43.7 Write 45.5 Mixed 34.3 31% 41.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.49 4K Write 1.71 4K Mixed 0.22 76% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 25.7% Great: 35%
SanDisk Cruzer Blade 32GB 34,316 User benchmarks, average bench 12% 25GB free, PID 5567 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)	5.69% Terrible	Read 17.1 Write 4.57 Mixed 11.8 12% 11.1 MB/s	4K Read 1.85 4K Write 0.58 4K Mixed 0.39 40% 0.94 MB/s
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 5.69% Great: 18%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 5x2GB 1,886 User benchmarks, average bench 41% 5 of 6 slots used 10GB DIMM Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	33.1% Below average	MC Read 11.3 MC Write 10.7 MC Mixed 12.4 33% 11.5 GB/s	SC Read 5.7 SC Write 7.4 SC Mixed 7.9 20% 7 GB/s	Latency 77.1 52% 77.1 ns
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 33.1% Great: 56%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-EX58-UD5 Builds (Compare 475 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 33%

Sail boat

Desktop 70%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 26%

Raft

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-EX58-UD5

CPU
Core i7-920Intel $90Bench 62%, 69,074 samples	209x
Xeon X5675IntelBench 75%, 8,072 samples	48x
Core i7 930Intel $199Bench 64%, 19,497 samples	30x

GPU
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	33x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	30x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	24x

SSD
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	23x
SU630 240GBAdataBench 64%, 60,212 samples	20x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	17x

RAM
6x2GBUnknownBench 46%, 38,297 samples	71x
6x4GBUnknownBench 47%, 28,320 samples	65x
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	49x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 53% - Above average

Total price: $390

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $179	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16