Alienware ASM100

Performance Results


Gaming 16% Surfboard	Desktop 69% Battle cruiser	Workstation 13% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	16.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	41.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (55%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago.

System	Alienware ASM100 (all builds)
Motherboard	Dell 03V3TG
Memory	10.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1360 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20140820
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Mar 16 '18 at 04:44
Run Duration	240 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	55%

PC Performing as expected (57^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-4765T 1,801 User benchmarks, average bench 64% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2.6 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (65^th percentile)	65% Good	Memory 85.8 1-Core 74.9 2-Core 144 62% 101 Pts	4-Core 243 8-Core 338 36% 290 Pts	64-Core 329 20% 329 Pts
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 65% Great: 70%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GPU 4,511 User benchmarks, average bench 16% Dell(1028 066A) 2GB CLim: 1097 MHz, MLim: 1252 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 391.1 Performing above expectations (69^th percentile)	16.4% Very poor	Lighting 20.4 Reflection 15.5 Parallax 18.5 17% 18.1 fps	MRender 24 Gravity 21.4 Splatting 15.3 16% 20.3 fps
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 16.4% Great: 18%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Addlink S10 240GB 129 User benchmarks, average bench 63% 110GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFM10.6 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 4 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 10 (A8) Unknown 100 100 0 (AA) Unknown 87 87 340 (AD) Unknown 100 100 1 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 5 (C2) HDA temperature 67 67 141736083489 (DA) Unknown 100 100 0 (E7) Temperature 100 100 100 (F1) Unknown 100 100 160	41.7% Average	Read 431 Write 69.3 Mixed 120 44% 207 MB/s	4K Read 21.9 4K Write 26.9 4K Mixed 5.44 54% 18.1 MB/s	DQ Read 179 DQ Write 44.4 DQ Mixed 11 34% 78.2 MB/s
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 41.7% Great: 83%
TOSHIBA TransMemory 32GB 7,326 User benchmarks, average bench 8% 27GB free, PID 6544 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile)	8.61% Terrible	Read 24.4 Write 16.6 Mixed 16.3 23% 19.1 MB/s	4K Read 3.95 4K Write 0.17 4K Mixed 0.16 26% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 8.61% Great: 20%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston HyperX DDR3 1600 C9 2x8GB 10,168 User benchmarks, average bench 55% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing as expected (54^th percentile)	55.7% Above average	MC Read 19.3 MC Write 21.4 MC Mixed 18.6 56% 19.8 GB/s	SC Read 13.3 SC Write 13.9 SC Mixed 16.4 42% 14.5 GB/s	Latency 71.4 56% 71.4 ns
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 55.7% Great: 61%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical ASM100 Builds (Compare 537 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 14%

Tree trunk

Desktop 66%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 12%

Tree trunk

System: Alienware ASM100

CPU
Core i3-4130TIntel $60Bench 56%, 5,264 samples	146x
Core i7-4785TIntelBench 64%, 2,627 samples	103x
Core i7-4765TIntelBench 64%, 1,801 samples	74x

GPU
GeForce GPUNvidiaBench 16%, 4,511 samples	533x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	1x
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	1x

SSD
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	22x
MX500 1TBCrucial $66Bench 106%, 202,785 samples	15x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	12x

RAM
HMT451S6BFR8A-PB 2x4GBHynixBench 48%, 30,280 samples	60x
M471B5173EB0-YK0 2x4GBSamsungBench 46%, 19,666 samples	43x
8KTF51264HZ-1G6E1 2x4GBMicronBench 48%, 14,177 samples	34x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 52% - Above average

Total price: $140

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16