Asus H81M-E

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 29%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 48%, this CPUs suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics23.1% is a below average 3D score (GTX 1070 = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive79.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 9 years and 4 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
High background CPU (27%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. Find active processes with Windows task manager (CTRL+SHIFT+ESC).
Run History
9 months ago, 9 months ago.
MotherboardAsus H81M-E  (all builds)
Memory3.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20141121
Uptime1.5 Days
Run DateMar 14 '18 at 05:05
Run Duration157 Seconds
Run User BGR-User
Background CPU 27%

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Single core Quad core Multi core
Intel Pentium G3258-$80
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
48% Average
SC Int 106
SC Float 106
SC Mixed 106
85% 106 Pts
QC Int 191
QC Float 192
QC Mixed 180
43% 188 Pts
MC Int 235
MC Float 229
MC Mixed 231
35% 232 Pts
Poor: 31%
This bench: 48%
Great: 61%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 750 Ti-$110
Gigabyte(1458 36CA) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1333 MHz, MLim: 1350 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 390.65
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
23.1% Poor
Lighting 71.3
Reflection 45.5
Parallax 66
22% 60.9 fps
MRender 53.7
Gravity 72.5
Splatting 39.8
24% 55.3 fps
Poor: 19%
This bench: 23.1%
Great: 25%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Samsung 750 EVO 250GB-$164
142GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MAT01B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
79.2% Very good
Read 490
Write 275
Mixed 212
72% 326 MB/s
4K Read 40.9
4K Write 62.1
4K Mixed 17.1
117% 40.1 MB/s
DQ Read 257
DQ Write 154
DQ Mixed 49.8
79% 154 MB/s
Poor: 69%
This bench: 79.2%
Great: 114%
WD Red 1TB (2012)-$65
531GB free
Firmware: 82.00A82 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
45.5% Average
Read 91.1
Write 68
Mixed 77.4
59% 78.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.03
4K Write 0.06
4K Mixed 0.03
5% 0.04 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 45.5%
Great: 87%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$24
454GB free
Firmware: KC45 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
64.1% Good
Read 115
Write 109
Mixed 54.5
68% 92.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.68
4K Write 1.09
4K Mixed 0.78
136% 0.85 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 64.1%
Great: 78%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Unknown 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
45.4% Average
MC Read 14.7
MC Write 18.3
MC Mixed 14.4
45% 15.8 GB/s
SC Read 10.5
SC Write 14
SC Mixed 13.3
36% 12.6 GB/s
Latency 78.2
51% 78.2 ns
Poor: 17%
This bench: 45.4%
Great: 60%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical H81M-E Builds (Compare 2,000 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 52%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 33%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Asus H81M-E - $54

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 67% - Good Total price: $309
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i7-8700K $370Nvidia GTX 1070 $330Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $63
AMD Ryzen 5 1600 $150Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB $229Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $90
Intel Core i5-8600K $243Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti $770Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $163
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $44Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $125SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $830SanDisk Extreme 32GB $48
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $44Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $130SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $12
Today's hottest deals
User Guide  •  About  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback