Gigabyte GA-990FXA-UD3

Performance Results


Gaming 52% Yacht	Desktop 72% Battleship	Workstation 42% Speed boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	75.1% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	63.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (76%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago.

Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-990FXA-UD3 (all builds)
Memory	12.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display	2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20130715
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Mar 14 '18 at 01:56
Run Duration	151 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	76%

PC Performing above expectations (65^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD FX-8320-$129 106,454 User benchmarks, average bench 59% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	66.6% Good	Memory 92.2 1-Core 65.4 2-Core 129 60% 95.4 Pts	4-Core 224 8-Core 379 37% 302 Pts	64-Core 386 24% 386 Pts
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 66.6% Great: 65%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX Titan X-$615 15,621 User benchmarks, average bench 75% Nvidia(10DE 1132) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1392 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 388.13 Performing below potential (57^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	75.1% Very good	Lighting 96.7 Reflection 108 Parallax 104 79% 103 fps	MRender 84.7 Gravity 90.6 Splatting 75.9 68% 83.8 fps
Poor: 68% ↑ This bench: 75.1% Great: 83%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow V300 240GB-$35 176,713 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 19GB free (System drive) Firmware: 527A Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (46^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 95 95 10945123 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 90 90 -135600707460549 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1200 (AB) Unknown 0 0 0 (AC) Unknown 0 0 0 (AE) Unknown 0 0 131 (B1) Unknown 0 0 5 (B5) Unknown 0 0 0 (B6) Unknown 0 0 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 30 42 60132294686 (C2) HDA temperature 30 42 60132294686 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 120 120 10945123 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 120 120 10945123 (CC) Soft ECC correction 120 120 10945123 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 100 (E7) Temperature 100 100 0 (E9) Unknown 0 0 16052 (EA) Unknown 0 0 14332 (F1) Unknown 0 0 14332 (F2) Unknown 0 0 9308	63.3% Good	Read 473 Write 189 Mixed 237 66% 299 MB/s	4K Read 24.2 4K Write 57.6 4K Mixed 16.7 88% 32.8 MB/s	DQ Read 172 DQ Write 133 DQ Mixed 9.88 46% 105 MB/s
Poor: 41% ↑ This bench: 63.3% Great: 85%
WD WD10EVDS-63N5B1 1TB 3,131 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 479GB free Firmware: 01.00A01 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing below expectations (30^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 207 192 5633 (04) Start/Stop count 93 93 7015 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 75 75 18560 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 2358 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 202 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 157 157 131792 (C2) HDA temperature 117 106 30 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 1 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	37.6% Below average	Read 62.6 Write 68.3 Mixed 16.8 36% 49.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.47 4K Write 1.39 4K Mixed 0.27 75% 0.71 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 37.6% Great: 57%
WD Blue 500GB (2008)-$29 203,744 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 198GB free Firmware: 01.0 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing above expectations (69^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 317 (03) Spinup time 139 136 4025 (04) Start/Stop count 95 95 5881 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 76 76 17829 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 2507 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 285 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 199 199 5595 (C2) HDA temperature 113 98 30 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 1 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	52.8% Above average	Read 96.2 Write 87.8 Mixed 101 72% 94.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.38 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.31 84% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 52.8% Great: 69%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL F3 DDR3 1866 C9 2x8GB 745 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 667 MHz clocked @ 933 MHz Performing way above expectations (89^th percentile)	52.7% Above average	MC Read 22.3 MC Write 15 MC Mixed 19.5 54% 18.9 GB/s	SC Read 10.9 SC Write 8.8 SC Mixed 13.9 32% 11.2 GB/s	Latency 63.6 63% 63.6 ns
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 52.7% Great: 54%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-990FXA-UD3 Builds (Compare 1,399 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 34%

Sail boat

Desktop 68%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 28%

Raft

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-990FXA-UD3 - $100

CPU
FX-8350AMD $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples	570x
FX-8320AMD $129Bench 59%, 106,454 samples	210x
FX-6300AMD $57Bench 55%, 261,607 samples	110x

GPU
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	74x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	66x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	61x

SSD
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	46x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	39x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	35x

RAM
4x4GBUnknownBench 43%, 106,178 samples	106x
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	85x
2x4GBUnknownBench 39%, 424,126 samples	82x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 71% - Very good

Total price: $440

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16