User System

Performance Results

Benchmarks - excluding GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.9%, this CPUs suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Boot Drive79.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory20GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 20GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 9 years and 4 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Sub-optimal background CPU (20%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. Find active processes with Windows task manager (CTRL+SHIFT+ESC).
SystemTEKNOSERVICE TTL TEKNOSLIM
MotherboardASUSTeK Q170M-C
Memory16.4 GB free of 20 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20170407
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 13 '18 at 18:03
Run Duration90 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 20%

 PC Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Single core Quad core Multi core
Intel Core i5-6500-$211
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
76.9% Very good
SC Int 94
SC Float 102
SC Mixed 98.1
78% 98.1 Pts
QC Int 371
QC Float 413
QC Mixed 414
90% 399 Pts
MC Int 391
MC Float 412
MC Mixed 394
60% 399 Pts
Poor: 52%
This bench: 76.9%
Great: 78%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Crucial MX300 275GB-$85
74GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M0C Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
79.1% Very good
Read 474
Write 331
Mixed 331
84% 379 MB/s
4K Read 26.1
4K Write 71.1
4K Mixed 24.2
108% 40.5 MB/s
DQ Read 225
DQ Write 108
DQ Mixed 40.1
63% 124 MB/s
Poor: 54%
This bench: 79.1%
Great: 94%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$58
227GB free
Firmware: CC29 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
94.3% Outstanding
Read 167
Write 162
Mixed 158
122% 162 MB/s
4K Read 0.54
4K Write 1.49
4K Mixed 0.27
80% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 94.3%
Great: 115%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Crucial CT8G4DFS8213.C8FBD1 CT4G4DFS8213.C8FBD1 CT8G4DFS8213.C8FBD1 20GB
2133, 2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 4096, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
68.2% Good
MC Read 25.1
MC Write 26.3
MC Mixed 22.3
70% 24.6 GB/s
SC Read 14.2
SC Write 22.9
SC Mixed 19.1
54% 18.7 GB/s
Latency 77
52% 77 ns
Poor: 40%
This bench: 68.2%
Great: 68%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i7-8700K $370Nvidia GTX 1070 $320Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $63
AMD Ryzen 5 1600 $150Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB $210Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $90
Intel Core i5-8600K $260Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti $808Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $163
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $40Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $125SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $70G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $830SanDisk Extreme 32GB $48
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $45Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $136SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $12
Today's hottest deals
User Guide  •  About  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback