Today's hottest deals

Lenovo 20FMS77A09

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 14%
Tree trunk
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (12th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 88 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 9.08%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics2.9% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive42.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 2 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (34%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 5% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
SystemLenovo 20FMS77A09  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 20FMS77A09
Memory0.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20161130
Uptime4.1 Days
Run DateMar 12 '18 at 16:18
Run Duration175 Seconds
Run User SGP-User
Background CPU 34%
CPU Throttled 5%

 PC Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-6300U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
9.08% Terrible
Memory 12.6
1-Core 12.3
2-Core 20.8
9% 15.2 Pts
4-Core 32.1
8-Core 34.2
4% 33.2 Pts
64-Core 53.4
3% 53.4 Pts
Poor: 16%
This bench: 9.08%
Great: 54%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 520 (Mobile Skylake)
Legend(17AA 5053) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4454
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
2.9% Terrible
Lighting 3.1
Reflection 4.65
Parallax 3.28
2% 3.68 fps
MRender 3.29
Gravity 2.73
Splatting 6.39
4% 4.14 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 2.9%
Great: 5%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel SSDSC2KF480H6L 480GB
104GB free (System drive)
Firmware: LSF
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
42.7% Average
Read 393
Write 259
Mixed 345
74% 333 MB/s
4K Read 8.44
4K Write 8.98
4K Mixed 10.2
31% 9.21 MB/s
DQ Read 43.4
DQ Write 22.2
DQ Mixed 11.5
14% 25.7 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 42.7%
Great: 88%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B1G73EB0-YK0 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
22.2% Poor
MC Read 8.9
MC Write 9.4
MC Mixed 9.2
26% 9.17 GB/s
SC Read 0.5
SC Write 3.8
SC Mixed 0.6
5% 1.63 GB/s
Latency 380
10% 380 ns
Poor: 16%
This bench: 22.2%
Great: 33%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback