MSI B150 GAMING M3 (MS-7978)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 31%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics30.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive36.2% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
SystemMSI MS-7978
MotherboardMSI B150 GAMING M3 (MS-7978)  (all builds)
Memory12.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1360 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20170424
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 11 '18 at 09:02
Run Duration264 Seconds
Run User ZAF-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700-$180
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
81.9% Excellent
Memory 84.1
1-Core 113
2-Core 220
78% 139 Pts
4-Core 429
8-Core 646
67% 537 Pts
64-Core 647
40% 647 Pts
Poor: 60%
This bench: 81.9%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
CLim: 1443 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 391.1
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
30.7% Below average
Lighting 31.3
Reflection 52.7
Parallax 33.4
26% 39.1 fps
MRender 59.2
Gravity 38.3
Splatting 51.8
41% 49.8 fps
Poor: 43%
This bench: 30.7%
Great: 54%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata SP900 64GB
15GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 5.0. Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
36.2% Below average
Read 180
Write 57
Mixed 72.8
22% 103 MB/s
4K Read 21.1
4K Write 56.7
4K Mixed 12.2
78% 30 MB/s
DQ Read 76.1
DQ Write 56.6
DQ Mixed 18.5
27% 50.4 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 36.2%
Great: 62%
Seagate SkyHawk 4TB (2016)-$95
1TB free
Firmware: CV11 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
70.1% Very good
Read 116
Write 129
Mixed 124
93% 123 MB/s
4K Read 0.22
4K Write 0.82
4K Mixed 0.19
45% 0.41 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 70.1%
Great: 107%
Samsung HD103SI 1TB-$89
931GB free
Firmware: 1AG0 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
40.7% Average
Read 96
Write 45.8
Mixed 74.5
54% 72.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.61
4K Write 1.35
4K Mixed 0.37
91% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 40.7%
Great: 59%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.10 320GB-$80
298GB free
Firmware: 3.AA Max speed: SATA 1.0 150 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
40.6% Average
Read 71.2
Write 70
Mixed 67.5
52% 69.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.68
4K Write 1.47
4K Mixed 0.4
100% 0.85 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 40.6%
Great: 43%
WD Elements 2TB
939GB free, PID 10b8
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
23.7% Poor
Read 50.1
Write 51
Mixed 41.8
61% 47.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.71
4K Mixed 0.17
65% 0.76 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 23.7%
Great: 44%
ST312002 2A 120GB
111GB free, PID null
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
11.6% Very poor
Read 20.8
Write 21.4
Mixed 20.7
27% 20.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.65
4K Write 1.22
4K Mixed 0.34
56% 0.74 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 11.6%
Great: 12%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 859B CT4G4DFS8213.C8FADP 859B CT4G4DFS8213.M8FA 859B CT4G4DFS8213.C8FADP 16GB
2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (10th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
71.7% Very good
MC Read 26.4
MC Write 27.7
MC Mixed 22.3
73% 25.5 GB/s
SC Read 16.1
SC Write 26.5
SC Mixed 21.8
61% 21.5 GB/s
Latency 73.2
55% 73.2 ns
Poor: 72%
This bench: 71.7%
Great: 75%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical B150 GAMING M3 (MS-7978) Builds (Compare 2,140 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 41%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 33%
Sail boat

Motherboard: MSI B150 GAMING M3 (MS-7978) - $100

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 66% - Good Total price: $508
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $131Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $186Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $34Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback