IBM 8183LT9

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 6.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	IBM 8183LT9 (all builds)
Motherboard	IBM IBM
Memory	0.8 GB free of 2 GB @ 0 GHz
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20040830
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Mar 11 '18 at 04:55
Run Duration	2943 Seconds
Run User	THA-User
Background CPU	100%

PC Performing as expected (41^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Pentium 4 3.00GHz 6,937 User benchmarks, average bench 29% WMT478/NWD, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 2 threads Base clock 3 GHz Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	6.2% Terrible	Memory 8.92 1-Core 14.3 2-Core 23.3 9% 15.5 Pts	4-Core 20.1 8-Core 22.2 3% 21.2 Pts	64-Core 31.5 2% 31.5 Pts
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 6.2% Great: 36%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Seagate ST380013AS 80GB-$75 2,837 User benchmarks, average bench 24% 6GB free (System drive) Firmware: 3.43 Max speed: SATA 1.0 150 MB/s Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 58 48 81830584 (03) Spinup time 98 98 0 (04) Start/Stop count 97 97 3657 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 79 60 97101491 (09) Power-on hours count 68 68 28064 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 96 96 4104 (C2) HDA temperature 37 45 55834574885 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 58 48 81830584 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 100 253 0 (CA) Data Address Mark errors 100 253 0	17.3% Very poor	Read 27.2 Write 32.8 Mixed 24.9 21% 28.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.26 4K Write 0.89 4K Mixed 0.18 48% 0.44 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 17.3% Great: 32%
TO Exter nal USB 3.0 250GB 61 User benchmarks, average bench 56% 40GB free, PID a001 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	11% Very poor	Read 22.5 Write 21.2 Mixed 2.81 18% 15.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.45 4K Write 0.97 4K Mixed 0.3 45% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 11% Great: 262%
Kingston DT 101 II 16GB 252 User benchmarks, average bench 6% 5GB free, PID 1625 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing as expected (47^th percentile)	4.82% Terrible	Read 17.7 Write 4.9 Mixed 8 11% 10.2 MB/s	4K Read 4.88 4K Write 0.009 4K Mixed 0.009 19% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 4.82% Great: 7%
SMI USB DISK 8GB 3,022 User benchmarks, average bench 6% 4GB free, PID 1000 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed Performing way above expectations (87^th percentile)	7.55% Terrible	Read 23.1 Write 6.1 Mixed 4.59 11% 11.3 MB/s	4K Read 2.73 4K Write 0.72 4K Mixed 0.55 53% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 7.55% Great: 10%
SMI USB DISK 8GB 3,022 User benchmarks, average bench 6% 3GB free, PID 1000 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed Performing way above expectations (87^th percentile)	8.34% Terrible	Read 20.5 Write 11.7 Mixed 6.68 14% 13 MB/s	4K Read 2.77 4K Write 0.7 4K Mixed 0.57 54% 1.35 MB/s
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 8.34% Great: 10%
HUAWEI SD Storage 2GB 115 User benchmarks, average bench 3% 2GB free, PID null Performing above expectations (74^th percentile)	3.24% Terrible	Read 10.4 Write 4.78 Mixed 6.18 8% 7.12 MB/s	4K Read 2.45 4K Write 0.04 4K Mixed 0.04 12% 0.84 MB/s
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 3.24% Great: 5%
Kingston DataTraveler 101 G2 USB 2.0 16GB-$8 3,010 User benchmarks, average bench 6% 1GB free, PID 1642 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing as expected (41^st percentile)	4.9% Terrible	Read 17.5 Write 5.9 Mixed 6.95 11% 10.1 MB/s	4K Read 4.39 4K Write 0.01 4K Mixed 0.007 17% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 4.9% Great: 9%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x1GB 68,489 User benchmarks, average bench 14% 2 of 4 slots used 2GB DIMM DDR Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	5.7% Terrible	MC Read 2.3 MC Write 1.8 MC Mixed 1.6 5% 1.9 GB/s	SC Read 1.2 SC Write 2.1 SC Mixed 1.1 4% 1.47 GB/s	Latency 414 10% 414 ns
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 5.7% Great: 20%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

IBM 8183LT9

Performance Results

PC Performing as expected (41st percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Feedback

PC Performing as expected (41^st percentile)