ADD TO PC
BUILD

Samsung 930X5J/910S5J

Performance Results


Gaming 8% Tree trunk	Desktop 62% Destroyer	Workstation 8% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (71st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 29 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	3.67% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	63.6% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago.

System	Samsung 930X5J/910S5J (all builds)
Motherboard	SAMSUNG NP930X5J-K01NL
Memory	5.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20140124
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Mar 11 '18 at 01:19
Run Duration	286 Seconds
Run User	BRA-User
Background CPU	7%

PC Performing above expectations (71^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-4500U-$393 39,249 User benchmarks, average bench 50% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.7 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	61.7% Good	Memory 87 1-Core 87 2-Core 143 65% 106 Pts	4-Core 215 8-Core 208 28% 212 Pts	64-Core 211 13% 211 Pts
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 61.7% Great: 62%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 4400 (Mobile 1.0/1.1 GHz) 275,372 User benchmarks, average bench 2% Sanyo(144D C10E) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.15.4256 Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	3.67% Terrible	Lighting 3.8 Reflection 5.88 Parallax 6.34 3% 5.34 fps	MRender 7.29 Gravity 2.23 Splatting 7.52 5% 5.68 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 3.67% Great: 3%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung MZNTE256HMHP-000 256GB 301 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 22GB free (System drive) Firmware: EXT21K0Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (52^nd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 98 98 6404 (0C) Power cycle count 96 96 3730 (B1) Unknown 97 97 97 (B3) Unknown 100 100 100 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 60 53 40 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 205 (F1) Unknown 99 99 14844099615 (F2) Unknown 99 99 21953790705	63.6% Good	Read 495 Write 82.3 Mixed 124 50% 234 MB/s	4K Read 36.4 4K Write 58.8 4K Mixed 12.8 103% 36 MB/s	DQ Read 348 DQ Write 81.8 DQ Mixed 27.6 69% 152 MB/s
Poor: 41% ↑ This bench: 63.6% Great: 85%
Kingston DataTraveler SE9 USB 2.0 16GB-$5 1,670 User benchmarks, average bench 6% 9GB free, PID 6545 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing above expectations (76^th percentile)	5.79% Terrible	Read 18.9 Write 6.07 Mixed 9.73 13% 11.6 MB/s	4K Read 7.3 4K Write 0.004 4K Mixed 0.006 27% 2.44 MB/s
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 5.79% Great: 7%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung 2x4GB 26,293 User benchmarks, average bench 59% 2 of 4 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing below potential (33^rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	56.8% Above average	MC Read 19.3 MC Write 21.6 MC Mixed 18.1 56% 19.7 GB/s	SC Read 15.8 SC Write 16.6 SC Mixed 19.4 49% 17.3 GB/s	Latency 70.5 57% 70.5 ns
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 56.8% Great: 81%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

The Best.

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback