Asus Z270-WS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 49%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 96%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 44%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 92.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics47.8% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive126% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus Z270-WS  (all builds)
Memory61.2 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors, ,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170913
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 10 '18 at 18:17
Run Duration329 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700K-$241
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
92.1% Outstanding
Memory 91
1-Core 144
2-Core 288
96% 174 Pts
4-Core 501
8-Core 791
80% 646 Pts
64-Core 804
50% 804 Pts
Poor: 71%
This bench: 92.1%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro K6000-$4,000
Nvidia(10DE 1036) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 901 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 388.13
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
47.8% Average
Lighting 60.6
Reflection 55.2
Parallax 78
49% 64.6 fps
MRender 66.1
Gravity 62.2
Splatting 41.1
45% 56.5 fps
Poor: 39%
This bench: 47.8%
Great: 47%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Pro 256GB-$190
236GB free
Firmware: DXM05B0Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
103% Outstanding
Read 508
Write 487
Mixed 505
112% 500 MB/s
4K Read 25.4
4K Write 106
4K Mixed 23.6
125% 51.7 MB/s
DQ Read 367
DQ Write 334
DQ Mixed 21.6
106% 241 MB/s
Poor: 68%
This bench: 103%
Great: 116%
Samsung PM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 128GB
56GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CXB7401Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
126% Outstanding
Read 1,074
Write 596
Mixed 678
173% 782 MB/s
4K Read 33.2
4K Write 102
4K Mixed 29.1
142% 54.9 MB/s
DQ Read 45.6
DQ Write 156
DQ Mixed 29.4
43% 77.1 MB/s
Poor: 108%
This bench: 126%
Great: 234%
CBM Flash Disk 2GB
1GB free, PID 2092
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
4.86% Terrible
Read 15.8
Write 3.75
Mixed 5.88
9% 8.46 MB/s
4K Read 7.14
4K Write 0.02
4K Mixed 0.03
28% 2.4 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 4.86%
Great: 6%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Team Group Inc. TEAMGROUP-UD4-3000 4x16GB
4 of 4 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (27th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
76% Very good
MC Read 26.8
MC Write 28
MC Mixed 24.2
75% 26.3 GB/s
SC Read 19.9
SC Write 30.9
SC Mixed 25.4
73% 25.4 GB/s
Latency 65.8
61% 65.8 ns
Poor: 70%
This bench: 76%
Great: 113%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z270-WS Builds (Compare 74 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 88%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 75%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asus Z270-WS

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $750
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $178Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback