Asus TUF Z270 MARK 1

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 42%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 100%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 38%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (91st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 9 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 97%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics35.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive110% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus TUF Z270 MARK 1  (all builds)
Memory12.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 3 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20170322
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 09 '18 at 03:37
Run Duration447 Seconds
Run User MEX-User
Background CPU 16%

 PC Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700K-$241
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
97% Outstanding
Memory 96.3
1-Core 153
2-Core 298
100% 182 Pts
4-Core 525
8-Core 825
83% 675 Pts
64-Core 788
49% 788 Pts
Poor: 71%
This bench: 97%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 770-$279
EVGA(3842 2770) 2GB
CLim: 1202 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 391.1
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
35.5% Below average
Lighting 42.5
Reflection 39.4
Parallax 56.1
35% 46 fps
MRender 54.6
Gravity 48.9
Splatting 36.7
37% 46.7 fps
Poor: 32%
This bench: 35.5%
Great: 36%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba THNSNJ256GCSY 256GB
135GB free (System drive)
Firmware: JYGA Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
110% Outstanding
Read 518
Write 478
Mixed 503
112% 500 MB/s
4K Read 26.6
4K Write 120
4K Mixed 45.4
162% 63.9 MB/s
DQ Read 232
DQ Write 228
DQ Mixed 132
126% 197 MB/s
Poor: 54%
This bench: 110%
Great: 105%
Samsung SSD 500GB
16GB free
Firmware: EMT0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Read 5,963
1,235% 5,963 MB/s
Poor: 71% Great: 135%
WD Blue 500GB (2008)-$29
76GB free
Firmware: 05.0 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 28% Great: 69%
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$24
57GB free
Firmware: 15.0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 24% Great: 69%
Generic Flash Disk 8GB
7GB free, PID 6387
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
4.52% Terrible
Read 17.6
Write 3.63
Mixed 4.56
8% 8.6 MB/s
4K Read 4.91
4K Write 0.004
4K Mixed 0.002
18% 1.64 MB/s
Poor: 2%
This bench: 4.52%
Great: 7%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Trident Z RGB DDR4 3000 C16 2x8GB-$56
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3000 MHz
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
96.3% Outstanding
MC Read 36.4
MC Write 37.1
MC Mixed 28.1
97% 33.9 GB/s
SC Read 21.6
SC Write 38.7
SC Mixed 29.9
86% 30.1 GB/s
Latency 53.1
75% 53.1 ns
Poor: 54%
This bench: 96.3%
Great: 101%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF Z270 MARK 1 Builds (Compare 803 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 90%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 77%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asus TUF Z270 MARK 1 - $131

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 81% - Excellent Total price: $909
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $15Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback