Asus SABERTOOTH X99

Performance Results


Gaming 62% Destroyer	Desktop 85% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 56% Gunboat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (76th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 24 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	62.3% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	43% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Asus SABERTOOTH X99 (all builds)
Memory	26.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	Цвета: 3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20150305
Uptime	0.6 Days
Run Date	Feb 14 '16 at 23:41
Run Duration	186 Seconds
Run User	RUS-User
Background CPU	1%

PC Performing above expectations (76^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-5820K-$130 101,694 User benchmarks, average bench 77% SOCKET 2011, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	88.4% Excellent	Memory 94.3 1-Core 83.9 2-Core 173 70% 117 Pts	4-Core 445 8-Core 732 72% 588 Pts	64-Core 938 58% 938 Pts
Poor: 68% ↑ This bench: 88.4% Great: 88%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 980-$500 167,107 User benchmarks, average bench 59% Zotac(19DA 1370) ≥ 4GB Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 10.18.13.6175 Performing above expectations (82^nd percentile)	62.3% Good	Lighting 79.1 Reflection 81 Parallax 72.4 64% 77.5 fps	MRender 79.5 Gravity 71.6 Splatting 64.8 58% 72 fps
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 62.3% Great: 66%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$109 695,664 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 196GB free Firmware: EMT01B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (25^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 1181 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 209 (B1) Unknown 99 99 1 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 67 60 33 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 7 (F1) Unknown 99 99 1300609157	101% Outstanding	Read 506 Write 404 Mixed 419 98% 443 MB/s	4K Read 41.9 4K Write 88.6 4K Mixed 44 167% 58.2 MB/s	DQ Read 37.9 DQ Write 204 DQ Mixed 92.5 80% 111 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 101% Great: 134%
Kingston SSDNow V+200 Series 120GB 853 User benchmarks, average bench 72% 25GB free (System drive) Firmware: 507KC4 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 106 106 13524200 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 94 94 139234249807838 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1287 (AB) Unknown 0 0 0 (AC) Unknown 0 0 0 (AE) Unknown 0 0 968 (B1) Unknown 0 0 4 (B5) Unknown 0 0 0 (B6) Unknown 0 0 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 28 77 5046300 (C2) HDA temperature 28 77 5046300 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 120 120 13524200 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 120 120 13524200 (CC) Soft ECC correction 120 120 13524200 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 100 (E7) Temperature 100 100 0 (E9) Unknown 0 0 8494 (EA) Unknown 0 0 6741 (F1) Unknown 0 0 6741 (F2) Unknown 0 0 3377	43% Average	Read 191 Write 98.7 Mixed 106 29% 132 MB/s	4K Read 23.6 4K Write 75.4 4K Mixed 9.57 88% 36.2 MB/s	DQ Read 121 DQ Write 77.4 DQ Mixed 30.4 41% 76.1 MB/s
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 43% Great: 83%
WD Green 3TB (2011)-$60 112,929 User benchmarks, average bench 62% 2TB free Firmware: 80.00A80 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (67^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 240 237 9958 (04) Start/Stop count 99 99 1638 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 94 94 4792 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1044 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 694 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 151 151 149761 (C2) HDA temperature 122 98 30 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	69% Good	Read 132 Write 109 Mixed 116 90% 119 MB/s	4K Read 0.45 4K Write 1.71 4K Mixed 0.15 67% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 69% Great: 83%
TS-RDF5 SD Transcend 128GB 589 User benchmarks, average bench 30% 112GB free, PID 4000 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	41% Average	Read 91.1 Write 84.7 Mixed 82.8 110% 86.2 MB/s	4K Read 7.16 4K Write 2.5 4K Mixed 1.88 175% 3.85 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 41% Great: 42%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston HyperX DDR4 2400 C15 4x8GB 3,679 User benchmarks, average bench 86% 4 of 8 slots used 32GB DIMM 2400 MHz clocked @ 2448 MHz Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	111% Outstanding	MC Read 43.3 MC Write 44 MC Mixed 43.9 125% 43.7 GB/s	SC Read 15.2 SC Write 16 SC Mixed 16 45% 15.7 GB/s	Latency 58.9 68% 58.9 ns
Poor: 70% ↑ This bench: 111% Great: 115%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical SABERTOOTH X99 Builds (Compare 955 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 82%

Aircraft carrier

Desktop 86%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 72%

Battleship

Motherboard: Asus SABERTOOTH X99

CPU
Core i7-5820KIntel $130Bench 77%, 101,694 samples	353x
Core i7-5930KIntel $70Bench 80%, 34,039 samples	157x
Core i7-6800KIntel $78Bench 81%, 50,196 samples	127x

GPU
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	107x
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	86x
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	73x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $95Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	39x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $109Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	34x
950 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBSamsung $625Bench 223%, 54,978 samples	33x

RAM
4x8GBUnknownBench 70%, 41,916 samples	30x
Ripjaws 4 DDR4 2800 C16 8x8GBG.SKILLBench 120%, 113 samples	24x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 4x8GBCorsairBench 87%, 76,101 samples	21x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 76% - Very good

Total price: $625

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16