Asus ROG ZENITH EXTREME

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Boot Drive223% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus ROG ZENITH EXTREME  (all builds)
Memory59.6 GB free of 64 GB @ 3.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170925
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateMar 08 '18 at 07:55
Run Duration212 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen TR 1950X-$225
SP3r2, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 3.95 GHz, turbo 4.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
83.4% Excellent
Memory 75
1-Core 123
2-Core 245
81% 148 Pts
4-Core 491
8-Core 978
87% 734 Pts
64-Core 2,692
167% 2,692 Pts
Poor: 68%
This bench: 83.4%
Great: 85%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43
330GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B7QCXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
223% Outstanding
Read 1,958
Write 1,438
Mixed 1,267
344% 1,554 MB/s
4K Read 49.2
4K Write 76.5
4K Mixed 40
166% 55.2 MB/s
DQ Read 213
DQ Write 101
DQ Mixed 69.8
75% 128 MB/s
Poor: 153%
This bench: 223%
Great: 254%
Intel 600p Series NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$119
294GB free
Firmware: PSF100C Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
149% Outstanding
Read 1,547
Write 543
Mixed 792
210% 961 MB/s
4K Read 30.1
4K Write 85.4
4K Mixed 43.7
147% 53.1 MB/s
DQ Read 230
DQ Write 138
DQ Mixed 96.2
95% 155 MB/s
Poor: 95%
This bench: 149%
Great: 144%
Crucial MX100 512GB-$200
225GB free
Firmware: MU01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
92.6% Outstanding
Read 502
Write 477
Mixed 460
107% 480 MB/s
4K Read 27.5
4K Write 76.4
4K Mixed 31.6
123% 45.2 MB/s
DQ Read 141
DQ Write 126
DQ Mixed 44.1
58% 104 MB/s
Poor: 61%
This bench: 92.6%
Great: 107%
Crucial MX300 525GB-$150
190GB free
Firmware: M0CR031 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
76.3% Very good
Read 483
Write 341
Mixed 340
86% 388 MB/s
4K Read 25
4K Write 54.6
4K Mixed 24.2
98% 34.6 MB/s
DQ Read 192
DQ Write 96.9
DQ Mixed 47.4
61% 112 MB/s
Poor: 65%
This bench: 76.3%
Great: 99%
OCZ INTREPID 3700 240GB
179GB free
Firmware: 1.5.0.7 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
76% Very good
Read 466
Write 209
Mixed 290
71% 322 MB/s
4K Read 32.4
4K Write 82
4K Mixed 25.1
125% 46.5 MB/s
DQ Read 192
DQ Write 149
DQ Mixed 77.3
83% 140 MB/s
Poor: 54%
This bench: 76%
Great: 88%
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016)-$80
3TB free
Firmware: CC26 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
92.8% Outstanding
Read 167
Write 157
Mixed 151
119% 158 MB/s
4K Read 0.76
4K Write 1.75
4K Mixed 0.24
91% 0.92 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 92.8%
Great: 114%
Hitachi HUS724030ALE641 3TB
482GB free
Firmware: MJ8OA5F0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
80% Very good
Read 137
Write 142
Mixed 173
114% 151 MB/s
4K Read 0.86
4K Write 2.22
4K Mixed 0.19
98% 1.09 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 80%
Great: 89%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown F4-3200C16-8GTZR F4-3200C16-8GTZR F4-3200C16-8GTZ F4-3200C16-8GTZR F4-3200C16-8GTZR F4-3200C16-8GTZR F4-3200C16-8GTZ F4-3200C16-8GTZR 64GB
3127, 3127, 3127, 3127, 3127, 3127, 3127, 3127 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (30th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
170% Outstanding
MC Read 68
MC Write 69.7
MC Mixed 64.5
193% 67.4 GB/s
SC Read 19.3
SC Write 43.6
SC Mixed 28
87% 30.3 GB/s
Latency 90.3
44% 90.3 ns
Poor: 168%
This bench: 170%
Great: 177%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ROG ZENITH EXTREME Builds (Compare 431 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 100%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 121%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus ROG ZENITH EXTREME - $29

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 73% - Very good Total price: $834
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback