Medion Akoya P5329 H / B526

Performance Results


Gaming 25% Raft	Desktop 79% Battleship	Workstation 20% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	30.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	70.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (22%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Medion Akoya P5329 H / B526 (all builds)
Motherboard	MEDION H81H3-EM2
Memory	9.3 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kleuren, 1024 x 768 - 32 Bit kleuren
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20141029
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Mar 07 '18 at 19:34
Run Duration	165 Seconds
Run User	BEL-User
Background CPU	22%

Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (54^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-4460-$194 245,403 User benchmarks, average bench 62% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	74.5% Very good	Memory 88.1 1-Core 94.8 2-Core 187 72% 123 Pts	4-Core 352 8-Core 359 47% 355 Pts	64-Core 358 22% 358 Pts
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 74.5% Great: 72%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59 946,701 User benchmarks, average bench 29% Asus(1043 85C1) CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 388.13 Performing way above expectations (85^th percentile)	30.9% Below average	Lighting 38.9 Reflection 30.2 Parallax 36.5 32% 35.2 fps	MRender 38.1 Gravity 36.9 Splatting 34 30% 36.3 fps
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 30.9% Great: 33%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston A400 120GB-$29 166,392 User benchmarks, average bench 61% 90GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFK11B1 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (75^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 1 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 6 (94) Unknown 255 255 0 (95) Unknown 255 255 0 (A7) Unknown 100 100 0 (A8) Unknown 100 100 3 (A9) Unknown 100 100 31 (AA) Unknown 100 100 59 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AD) Unknown 100 100 1 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 255 255 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 4 (C2) HDA temperature 65 64 154620264483 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 3 (DA) Unknown 100 100 3 (E7) Temperature 100 100 100 (E9) Unknown 100 100 21 (F1) Unknown 100 100 22 (F2) Unknown 100 100 8 (F4) Unknown 100 100 0 (F5) Unknown 100 100 1 (F6) Unknown 100 100 5456	70.4% Very good	Read 485 Write 305 Mixed 322 82% 371 MB/s	4K Read 31.3 4K Write 53.8 4K Mixed 6.52 84% 30.5 MB/s	DQ Read 223 DQ Write 183 DQ Mixed 6.42 58% 138 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 70.4% Great: 85%
Seagate Desktop SSHD 2TB-$50 94,145 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 1TB free Firmware: CC43 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 117 99 157175568 (03) Spinup time 95 95 0 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 937 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 84 60 9137726874 (09) Power-on hours count 85 85 13346 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1121 (B7) Unknown 1 1 290 (B8) Unknown 94 94 6 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 97 131813 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 65 47 606273571 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 392 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 99 99 2093 (C2) HDA temperature 35 53 55834574883 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 198 1675 (F0) Head flying hours 100 253 -66099546672270 (F1) Unknown 100 253 93565954893 (F2) Unknown 100 253 117612702962	67.1% Good	Read 126 Write 106 Mixed 105 84% 112 MB/s	4K Read 1.15 4K Write 5.16 4K Mixed 1.01 255% 2.44 MB/s
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 67.1% Great: 108%
SanDisk Ultra USB 3.0 32GB-$8 33,725 User benchmarks, average bench 26% 25GB free, PID 5581 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed Performing below expectations (35^th percentile)	18.9% Very poor	Read 38.6 Write 21.4 Mixed 26.5 34% 28.8 MB/s	4K Read 5.24 4K Write 2.42 4K Mixed 1.22 143% 2.96 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 18.9% Great: 38%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M378B1G73QH0-CK0 M378B5173QH0-CK0 12GB 328 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 1600, 1600 MHz 8192, 4096 MB Performing below potential (12^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	32.4% Below average	MC Read 10.6 MC Write 11.8 MC Mixed 9.7 31% 10.7 GB/s	SC Read 4.8 SC Write 10 SC Mixed 10.4 24% 8.4 GB/s	Latency 69.4 58% 69.4 ns
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 32.4% Great: 56%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Akoya P5329 H / B526 Builds (Compare 6 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 0%

Incomplete

Desktop 0%

Incomplete

Workstation 0%

Incomplete

System: Medion Akoya P5329 H / B526

CPU
Core i5-4460Intel $194Bench 62%, 245,403 samples	6x

GPU
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	3x
GTX 1050Nvidia $101Bench 26%, 269,381 samples	1x
GTX 745 (OEM)Nvidia $60Bench 10%, 26,874 samples	1x

RAM
M378B1G73QH0-CK0 0420 F3-1600C11-8GNT 16GBSamsungBench 58%, 8 samples	3x
M378B5173QH0-CK0 M378B1G73QH0-CK0 12GBSamsungBench 41%, 388 samples	1x
M378B1G73QH0-CK0 M378B5173QH0-CK0 12GBSamsungBench 43%, 328 samples	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 99% - Outstanding

Total price: $327

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $178	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Medion Akoya P5329 H / B526

Performance Results

PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

System: Medion Akoya P5329 H / B526

Feedback

PC Performing as expected (54^th percentile)