| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 38.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor. |
| Graphics | 1.43% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
| Memory | 2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen. |
Very high background CPU (33%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| System | Radio A24Win8 (all builds) |
| Motherboard | Radio A24Win8 |
| Memory | 0.8 GB free of 2 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
| Display | 1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colores |
| OS | Windows 8.1 |
| BIOS Date | 20121108 |
| Uptime | 0.1 Days |
| Run Date | Mar 07 '18 at 17:02 |
| Run Duration | 106 Seconds |
| Run User | ARG-User |
| Background CPU | 33% |
PC Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Celeron 1005M
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.9 GHz, turbo 1.9 GHz (avg)
|
38.8%
Below average
|
31% 42.3 Pts
|
9% 72.1 Pts
|
6% 90.7 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Intel HD Graphics (G3 Pentium/Celeron 1.0/1.1 GHz)
Device(1B0A 20C5) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim32.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4425
|
1.43%
Terrible
|
1% 1.41 fps
|
2% 2.1 fps
| |
| Drive | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Hitachi HTS545032A7E380 320GB
276GB free (System drive)
Firmware: GGBOAC90 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
|
42.8%
Average
|
52% 69.8 MB/s
|
63% 0.67 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Unknown N3S02F1333EREV.00 1x2GB
1 of 1 slots used
2GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
|
18.3%
Very poor
|
17% 5.8 GB/s
|
15% 5.3 GB/s
|
36% 110 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical A24Win8 Builds (Compare 11 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
System: Radio A24Win8
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i3-3120MIntel $100Bench 50%, 14,372 samples | 3x |
| Core i5-3230MIntel $100Bench 49%, 61,311 samples | 2x |
| Core i7-3632QMIntelBench 61%, 24,912 samples | 2x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 409,110 samples | 9x |
| HD Graphics (G2 Pentium/Celeron 1.1/1.15 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 45,735 samples | 2x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 45% - Average | Total price: $169 |