Asus P4S8X-X

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 11%
Tree trunk
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 19.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics4.55% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory2.5GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 2.5GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 13 years and 4 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
High background CPU (22%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus P4S8X-X  (all builds)
Memory1.5 GB free of 2.5 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20031031
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 06 '18 at 22:14
Run Duration132 Seconds
Run User FIN-User
Background CPU 22%

 PC Performing as expected (45th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
Intel Pentium 4 3.06GHz-$120
PGA 478, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3.05 GHz
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
19.8% Very poor
Memory 34.3
1-Core 21.7
2-Core 35.9
20% 30.6 Pts
4-Core 31.4
8-Core 36.8
4% 34.1 Pts
64-Core 37.6
2% 37.6 Pts
Poor: 11%
This bench: 19.8%
Great: 34%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 3850 AGP
Sapphire(174B 0028) 512MB
Driver: aticfx32.dll Ver. 8.970.100.1100
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
4.55% Terrible
Lighting 7.37
Reflection 10.2
Parallax 2.03
6% 6.53 fps
MRender 6.33
Gravity 3
Splatting 11.8
3% 7.05 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 4.55%
Great: 5%
Drive Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Maxtor 4D080H4 82GB
46GB free (System drive)
Firmware: DAH017K0 Max speed: UDMA 100 100 MB/s
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
16% Very poor
Read 28.7
Write 27.1
Mixed 13.3
17% 23 MB/s
4K Read 0.08
4K Write 0.14
4K Mixed 0.07
14% 0.1 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 16%
Great: 19%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Unknown 2GB
null MHz
512, 1024, 1024 MB
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
5.39% Terrible
MC Read 1.7
MC Write 1.5
MC Mixed 1.3
4% 1.5 GB/s
SC Read 1.6
SC Write 1.5
SC Mixed 1.4
4% 1.5 GB/s
Latency 231
17% 231 ns
Poor: 7%
This bench: 5.39%
Great: 27%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $320Nvidia RTX 3070 $450Crucial MX500 250GB $37
Intel Core i5-12400F $170Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $460Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $106
Intel Core i7-12700K $322Nvidia RTX 3050 $297Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $41Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $50SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $53SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $453SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback