Asus CM1740

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 19%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 35.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics47.4% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive40.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (34%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAsus CM1740  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK CM1740
Memory3.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110908
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateMar 06 '18 at 21:40
Run Duration205 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 34%
Watch Gameplay: 480 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (36th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A8-3850 APU-$80
FM1 , 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 2.85 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
35.4% Below average
Memory 51.7
1-Core 42.1
2-Core 74.6
35% 56.1 Pts
4-Core 106
8-Core 145
16% 125 Pts
64-Core 118
7% 118 Pts
Poor: 36%
This bench: 35.4%
Great: 54%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 480-$75
Gigabyte(1458 22D0) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1290 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 18.2.1
Performing below potential (58th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
47.4% Average
Lighting 56.9
Reflection 65.5
Parallax 87.7
46% 70.1 fps
MRender 67.3
Gravity 61.6
Splatting 54.7
49% 61.2 fps
Poor: 35%
This bench: 47.4%
Great: 53%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel 530 Series 120GB-$79
29GB free (System drive)
Firmware: DC32 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
40.5% Average
Read 297
Write 118
Mixed 135
40% 183 MB/s
4K Read 18.5
4K Write 43.7
4K Mixed 10.9
65% 24.4 MB/s
DQ Read 25
DQ Write 84.2
DQ Mixed 11.3
21% 40.2 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 40.5%
Great: 79%
Hitachi HDS721050CLA360 2TB
265GB free
Firmware: CC95 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
33.7% Below average
Read 57.4
Write 59.7
Mixed 23.8
34% 47 MB/s
4K Read 0.71
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.49
108% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 33.7%
Great: 80%
Samsung Spinpoint T166 500GB-$40
94GB free
Firmware: CR100-13 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
33.1% Below average
Read 59.4
Write 55.7
Mixed 45.2
40% 53.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.45
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.33
78% 0.66 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 33.1%
Great: 44%
Hitachi HDS721050CLA360 500GB
58GB free
Firmware: JP2OA50E Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
66.2% Good
Read 111
Write 120
Mixed 45.5
68% 92.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.53
4K Write 1.27
4K Mixed 0.33
82% 0.71 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 66.2%
Great: 77%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown SLZ302G08-MDJHB PSD32G133381 SLZ302G08-MDJHB PSD32G133381 8GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
2048, 2048, 2048, 2048 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
25.3% Poor
MC Read 10.3
MC Write 11.1
MC Mixed 6.5
27% 9.3 GB/s
SC Read 5.1
SC Write 4.1
SC Mixed 6
14% 5.07 GB/s
Latency 155
26% 155 ns
Poor: 25%
This bench: 25.3%
Great: 38%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical CM1740 Builds (Compare 32 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 39%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Asus CM1740

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback