PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (26th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 74 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 45.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average. |
Graphics | 53.2% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 43% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications. |
Memory | 32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
System | Dell Precision WorkStation T5400 (all builds) |
Motherboard | Dell 0RW203 |
Memory | 19.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 0.7 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20120430 |
Uptime | 19.2 Days |
Run Date | Mar 06 '18 at 21:14 |
Run Duration | 154 Seconds |
Run User | NOR-User |
Background CPU | 31% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
1st CPU: Intel Xeon X5470
CPU, 2 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.35 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
|
45.7%
Average
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
CLim: 1455 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 391.1
|
53.2%
Above average
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
94.5%
Outstanding
|
||||
43%
Average
|
||||
RAID0 640GB
306GB free
Firmware: 1.0. Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
|
46.9%
Average
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Unknown 8x4GB
8 of 8 slots used
32GB FB-DIMM DDR2 FB-DIMM
|
17.8%
Very poor
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
CPU: Intel Xeon X54601stBench 48%, 616 samples | 21x |
CPU: Intel Xeon E54101stBench 43%, 392 samples | 18x |
CPU: Intel Xeon E54201stBench 44%, 603 samples | 15x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 750-TiNvidia $92Bench 17%, 309,423 samples | 12x |
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 10x |
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples | 9x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 36% - Below average | Total price: $172 |