Asus STRIX Z270H GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 111%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 137%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 101%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (71st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 29 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 108%, this CPUs suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics107% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive239% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Run History
11 months ago, 9 months ago.
MotherboardAsus STRIX Z270H GAMING  (all builds)
Memory13.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit färger
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170723
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateMar 06 '18 at 17:16
Run Duration221 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (71st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Single core Quad core Multi core
Intel Core i7-7700K-$350
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
108% Outstanding
SC Int 148
SC Float 153
SC Mixed 151
120% 151 Pts
QC Int 504
QC Float 548
QC Mixed 529
119% 527 Pts
MC Int 753
MC Float 838
MC Mixed 816
120% 803 Pts
Poor: 78%
This bench: 108%
Great: 110%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$335
CLim: 2037 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 388.31
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
107% Outstanding
Lighting 340
Reflection 318
Parallax 328
104% 329 fps
MRender 210
Gravity 310
Splatting 244
109% 254 fps
Poor: 81%
This bench: 107%
Great: 109%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$100
92GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3B7QCXE7 Max speed: PCIe 5,000 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
239% Outstanding
Read 2,091
Write 1,202
Mixed 1,168
328% 1,487 MB/s
4K Read 59.5
4K Write 120
4K Mixed 45.2
212% 74.8 MB/s
DQ Read 579
DQ Write 255
DQ Mixed 175
194% 337 MB/s
Poor: 136%
This bench: 239%
Great: 237%
Kingston HyperX 120GB
31GB free
Firmware: 526ABBF0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
75.4% Very good
Read 514
Write 143
Mixed 200
62% 286 MB/s
4K Read 32.6
4K Write 103
4K Mixed 22.2
132% 52.7 MB/s
DQ Read 174
DQ Write 156
DQ Mixed 53.9
71% 128 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 75.4%
Great: 82%
Intel 530 Series 240GB-$149
17GB free
Firmware: DC32 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
48.2% Average
Read 134
Write 125
Mixed 130
29% 130 MB/s
4K Read 28.4
4K Write 61.4
4K Mixed 21.9
104% 37.3 MB/s
DQ Read 94.9
DQ Write 96
DQ Mixed 51.2
51% 80.7 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 48.2%
Great: 92%
Kingston HyperX 240GB-$70
8GB free
Firmware: 526ABBF0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
78.4% Very good
Read 482
Write 197
Mixed 287
71% 322 MB/s
4K Read 30.1
4K Write 93.7
4K Mixed 23
125% 48.9 MB/s
DQ Read 234
DQ Write 234
DQ Mixed 71.6
98% 180 MB/s
Poor: 54%
This bench: 78.4%
Great: 88%
HGST Deskstar NAS 4TB-$150
1.5TB free
Firmware: MJAOA5E0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
74.5% Very good
Read 136
Write 124
Mixed 128
97% 129 MB/s
4K Read 0.92
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.22
94% 0.94 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 74.5%
Great: 90%
Toshiba DT01ACA200 2TB-$65
412GB free
Firmware: MX4OABB0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
92.1% Outstanding
Read 170
Write 151
Mixed 151
118% 157 MB/s
4K Read 0.73
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.21
80% 0.78 MB/s
Poor: 54%
This bench: 92.1%
Great: 110%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB-$125
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3203 MHz
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
101% Outstanding
MC Read 38.1
MC Write 39.4
MC Mixed 29.1
102% 35.5 GB/s
SC Read 18.8
SC Write 40.3
SC Mixed 33.1
88% 30.7 GB/s
Latency 46.6
86% 46.6 ns
Poor: 54%
This bench: 101%
Great: 105%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical STRIX Z270H GAMING Builds (Compare 5,301 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 107%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 93%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 72%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asus STRIX Z270H GAMING - $155

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 101% - Outstanding Total price: $1,183
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i7-8700K $370Nvidia GTX 1070 $335Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $63
AMD Ryzen 5 1600 $150Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB $210Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $100
Intel Core i5-8600K $243Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti $808Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $163
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $40Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $125SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $830SanDisk Extreme 32GB $48
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $45Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $135SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $12
Today's hottest deals
User Guide  •  About  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback