| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good. |
| Graphics | 3.47% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
| Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Run History
6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)
| Motherboard | Biostar A320MH PRO (all builds) |
| Memory | 5.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20170418 |
| Uptime | 3.4 Days |
| Run Date | Mar 05 '18 at 20:02 |
| Run Duration | 91 Seconds |
| Run User | THA-User |
| Background CPU | 2% |
PC Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
75.5%
Very good
|
78% 142 Pts
|
59% 441 Pts
|
28% 447 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GeForce GT 630
Gigabyte(1458 3544) 2GB
CLim: 700 MHz, MLim: 400 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 391.1
|
3.47%
Terrible
|
4% 3.47 fps
|
4% 4.4 fps
| |
| Drive | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
55.7%
Above average
|
72% 95.5 MB/s
|
85% 0.81 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Unknown Micron AFLD44EN1P 8GB
2400, 2400 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
|
85.2%
Excellent
|
88% 30.8 GB/s
|
75% 26.1 GB/s
|
44% 91.4 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical A320MH PRO Builds (Compare 60 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Biostar A320MH PRO
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Ryzen 3 2200GAMD $104Bench 60%, 181,631 samples | 6x |
| Ryzen 3 1200AMD $100Bench 57%, 83,528 samples | 5x |
| Ryzen 5 1600AMD $110Bench 70%, 392,253 samples | 4x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 6x |
| GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 4x |
| Radeon R7 GraphicsAMDBench 6%, 37,078 samples | 3x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 80% - Very good | Total price: $195 |