Performance Results


Gaming 32% Sail boat	Desktop 68% Battle cruiser	Workstation 27% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (27th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 73 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	47.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	104% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (37%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (27^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-6700HQ 320,434 User benchmarks, average bench 59% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (43^rd percentile)	59.4% Above average	Memory 74.9 1-Core 75.3 2-Core 135 57% 95.1 Pts	4-Core 238 8-Core 368 38% 303 Pts	64-Core 401 25% 401 Pts
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 59.4% Great: 69%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060 (Mobile) 177,775 User benchmarks, average bench 47% Device(1A58 674F) ≥ 4GB Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 23.21.13.9101 Performing below potential (50^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	47.1% Average	Lighting 57.5 Reflection 63.7 Parallax 57.1 47% 59.4 fps	MRender 61.9 Gravity 52.8 Splatting 59.4 48% 58 fps
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 47.1% Great: 52%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung PM951 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB 1,440 User benchmarks, average bench 147% 64GB free (System drive) Firmware: BXV7000Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	104% Outstanding	Read 1,490 Write 195 Mixed 377 147% 687 MB/s	4K Read 18.8 4K Write 58.3 4K Mixed 19.2 84% 32.1 MB/s	DQ Read 225 DQ Write 106 DQ Mixed 59.9 72% 130 MB/s
Poor: 99% ↑ This bench: 104% Great: 175%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471A5244BB0-CPB 2x8GB 2,466 User benchmarks, average bench 65% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing below potential (5^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	53.6% Above average	MC Read 20.2 MC Write 19.9 MC Mixed 16.9 54% 19 GB/s	SC Read 11.5 SC Write 19.2 SC Mixed 16.6 45% 15.8 GB/s	Latency 90.5 44% 90.5 ns
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 53.6% Great: 70%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $34	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16