HP Z800 Workstation

Performance Results


Gaming 31% Sail boat	Desktop 65% Battle cruiser	Workstation 22% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 53.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	56.2% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	72.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (42%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago.

System	HP Z800 Workstation (all builds)
Motherboard	Hewlett-Packard 0AECh
Memory	8.7 GB free of 12.002 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20160224
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Mar 05 '18 at 14:03
Run Duration	265 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	42%

Watch Gameplay: 1060-3GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (42^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon X5560 520 User benchmarks, average bench 68% CPU0 PROCESSOR, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 2 threads Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.05 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	53.6% Above average	Memory 92.2 1-Core 52.5 2-Core 85.7 52% 76.8 Pts	4-Core 92.5 8-Core 89.2 12% 90.8 Pts	64-Core 74 5% 74 Pts
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 53.6% Great: 74%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$119 627,793 User benchmarks, average bench 52% PNY(196E 11D9) 3GB CLim: 1987 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 391.1 Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	56.2% Above average	Lighting 68.4 Reflection 68.3 Parallax 61 56% 65.9 fps	MRender 71.6 Gravity 67.2 Splatting 70.5 57% 69.8 fps
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 56.2% Great: 56%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Pro 512GB-$210 68,849 User benchmarks, average bench 102% 350GB free (System drive) Firmware: EXM0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 94 94 27099 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 714 (B1) Unknown 95 95 273 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 75 63 25 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 214 (F1) Unknown 99 99 205592845323	72.3% Very good	Read 385 Write 351 Mixed 369 82% 368 MB/s	4K Read 25.7 4K Write 50.7 4K Mixed 24 97% 33.5 MB/s	DQ Read 169 DQ Write 108 DQ Mixed 73 72% 117 MB/s
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 72.3% Great: 124%
Samsung 840 Evo 1TB-$199 23,857 User benchmarks, average bench 105% 291GB free Firmware: EXT0DB6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below potential (2^nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 94 94 26250 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 597 (B1) Unknown 96 96 47 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 74 57 26 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 319 (F1) Unknown 99 99 78888252603	54.4% Above average	Read 263 Write 179 Mixed 185 46% 209 MB/s	4K Read 31.2 4K Write 38 4K Mixed 19.9 93% 29.7 MB/s	DQ Read 141 DQ Write 93.7 DQ Mixed 51.5 56% 95.4 MB/s
Poor: 78% ↑ This bench: 54.4% Great: 126%
WD Blue 500GB (2007)-$80 10,362 User benchmarks, average bench 38% 433GB free Firmware: 01.03B01 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 163 161 4841 (04) Start/Stop count 96 96 4048 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 253 0 (09) Power-on hours count 38 38 45340 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 812 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 206 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 199 199 4048 (C2) HDA temperature 119 100 28 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	58.1% Above average	Read 104 Write 98.5 Mixed 95.8 75% 99.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.65 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 0.51 121% 1.05 MB/s
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 58.1% Great: 51%
Seagate Barracuda 4TB (2017)-$79 179,101 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 465GB free Firmware: 0001 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 79 64 79994735 (03) Spinup time 96 96 0 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 992 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 79 60 80667766 (09) Power-on hours count 98 98 121496034871092 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 68 (B7) Unknown 93 93 7 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 75 69 420413465 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 96 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 99 99 3359 (C2) HDA temperature 25 40 64424509465 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 79 64 79994735 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (F0) Head flying hours 100 253 128170414048353 (F1) Unknown 100 253 31834262815 (F2) Unknown 100 253 15103236065	50.7% Above average	Read 109 Write 65.8 Mixed 54.3 57% 76.4 MB/s	4K Read 1.72 4K Write 5.66 4K Mixed 0.28 207% 2.55 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 50.7% Great: 90%
WD WD16 00HLHX-60JJPV0 160GB 12 User benchmarks, average bench 72% 149GB free Firmware: 04.0 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 191 190 1441 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 238 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 96 96 2990 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 192 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 99 1 (BE) vendor-specific 75 64 420479001 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 121 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 200 200 116 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	78% Very good	Read 135 Write 136 Mixed 133 101% 135 MB/s	4K Read 1.11 4K Write 3.32 4K Mixed 0.55 169% 1.66 MB/s
Poor: 67% ↑ This bench: 78% Great: 79%
Mushkin Ventura Ultra USB 3.0 60GB-$76 38 User benchmarks, average bench 143% 51GB free, PID 55aa Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Performing as expected (59^th percentile)	165% Outstanding	Read 133 Write 52.8 Mixed 75.3 98% 87.2 MB/s	4K Read 16.3 4K Write 42.5 4K Mixed 8.78 1,804% 22.5 MB/s	DQ Read 18.7 DQ Write 52.2 DQ Mixed 9.12 2,156% 26.7 MB/s
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 165% Great: 209%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown ID:80 2C 18JSF25672AZ-1G4G1 ID:80 CE M391B5673FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M391B5673FH0-CH9 ID:80 2C 18JSF25672AZ-1G4G1 ID:80 CE M391B5673FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M391B5673EH1-CH9 46GB 9 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz 2048, 2048, 2048, 2048, 2048, 2048, 34816 MB Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	27.8% Poor	MC Read 10.5 MC Write 5.8 MC Mixed 9.4 24% 8.57 GB/s	SC Read 9.9 SC Write 6.1 SC Mixed 7.9 23% 7.97 GB/s	Latency 63.7 63% 63.7 ns
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 27.8% Great: 52%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Z800 Workstation Builds (Compare 1,940 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 10%

Tree trunk

Desktop 60%

Destroyer

Workstation 10%

Tree trunk

System: HP Z800 Workstation

CPU
CPU: Intel Xeon X56501stBench 64%, 7,756 samples	318x
CPU: Intel Xeon X56751stBench 68%, 4,275 samples	188x
CPU: Intel Xeon X56701stBench 67%, 4,676 samples	179x

GPU
Quadro 4000NvidiaBench 7%, 8,609 samples	161x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	87x
Quadro 5000NvidiaBench 10%, 751 samples	67x

SSD
WDS100T2B0A-00SM50 1TBWDCBench 98%, 74,123 samples	38x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $109Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	34x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	34x

RAM
ID:80 CE M393B5170FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M393B5170FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M393B5170FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M393B5170FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M393B5170FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M393B5170FH0-CH9 58GBUnknownBench 50%, 261 samples	23x
ID:80 2C 36JSZF51272PZ1G4F1 ID:80 2C 36JSZF51272PZ1G4F1 ID:80 2C 36JSZF51272PZ1G4F1 ID:80 2C 36JSZF51272PZ1G4F1 ID:80 2C 36JSZF51272PZ1G4F1 ID:80 2C 36JSZF51272PZ1G4F1 ID:80 2C 36JSZF51272PZ1G4F1 JE... 82GBUnknownBench 53%, 67 samples	19x
ID:80 AD HMT31GR7BFR4C-H9 ID:80 AD HMT31GR7BFR4C-H9 ID:80 AD HMT31GR7BFR4C-H9 ID:80 AD HMT31GR7BFR4C-H9 ID:80 AD HMT31GR7BFR4C-H9 ID:80 AD HMT31GR7BFR4C-H9 ID:80 AD HMT31GR7BFR4C-H9 ID:80 AD H... 130GBUnknownBench 53%, 67 samples	15x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16