Samsung 530U3BI/530U4BI/530U4BH

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (82nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 18 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 52.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
SystemSamsung 530U3BI/530U4BI/530U4BH  (all builds)
MotherboardSAMSUNG 530U3BI/530U4BI/530U4BH
Memory3.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20130328
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 05 '18 at 09:54
Run Duration115 Seconds
Run User THA-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2467M
CPU, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.6 GHz
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
52.6% Above average
Memory 82.9
1-Core 55.9
2-Core 100
52% 79.7 Pts
4-Core 132
8-Core 133
18% 133 Pts
64-Core 134
8% 134 Pts
Poor: 29%
This bench: 52.6%
Great: 54%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 3000 (Mobile V1 1.1/1.2 GHz)
Sanyo(144D C0C7) 3.8GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 8.951.9.3000
Relative performance n/a - atypical extreme
Poor: 1% Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 120GB-$85
17GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 63% Great: 108%
WD Blue 2.5" 1TB (2004)-$47
601GB free
Firmware: 01.0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
55.8% Above average
Read 95.9
Write 98.3
Mixed 96
73% 96.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.49
4K Write 2.07
4K Mixed 0.26
88% 0.94 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 55.8%
Great: 62%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B5273CH0-CH9 Kingston 99U5428-040.A01G 8GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
48.4% Average
MC Read 16.9
MC Write 18.4
MC Mixed 16.2
49% 17.2 GB/s
SC Read 12.4
SC Write 11.6
SC Mixed 12.5
35% 12.2 GB/s
Latency 75.4
53% 75.4 ns
Poor: 42%
This bench: 48.4%
Great: 50%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 530U3BI/530U4BI/530U4BH Builds (Compare 77 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 44%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Samsung 530U3BI/530U4BI/530U4BH

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $132Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $186Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $34Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback