HP Z800 Workstation

Performance Results


Gaming 24% Surfboard	Desktop 62% Destroyer	Workstation 17% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 48.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	46.7% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	68.7% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago.

System	HP Z800 Workstation (all builds)
Motherboard	Hewlett-Packard 0AECh
Memory	8.9 GB free of 12.002 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20160224
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Mar 05 '18 at 08:39
Run Duration	275 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	15%

Watch Gameplay: 1060-3GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon X5560 520 User benchmarks, average bench 68% CPU0 PROCESSOR, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 2 threads Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.75 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	48.7% Average	Memory 84.5 1-Core 57.4 2-Core 86.4 51% 76.1 Pts	4-Core 77 8-Core 85 11% 81 Pts	64-Core 85.5 5% 85.5 Pts
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 48.7% Great: 74%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$119 627,793 User benchmarks, average bench 52% PNY(196E 11D9) 3GB CLim: 1987 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 391.1 Performing below potential (6^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	46.7% Average	Lighting 50.3 Reflection 66.4 Parallax 65.6 41% 60.8 fps	MRender 72.1 Gravity 68.1 Splatting 71 58% 70.4 fps
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 46.7% Great: 56%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Pro 512GB-$210 68,849 User benchmarks, average bench 102% 312GB free (System drive) Firmware: EXM0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 94 94 27093 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 714 (B1) Unknown 95 95 273 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 74 63 26 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 214 (F1) Unknown 99 99 205558803165	68.7% Good	Read 379 Write 349 Mixed 370 82% 366 MB/s	4K Read 25.8 4K Write 51.6 4K Mixed 22.7 96% 33.4 MB/s	DQ Read 27.4 DQ Write 122 DQ Mixed 57.6 49% 69.1 MB/s
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 68.7% Great: 124%
Samsung 840 Evo 1TB-$199 23,857 User benchmarks, average bench 105% 281GB free Firmware: EXT0DB6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below potential (2^nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 94 94 26244 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 597 (B1) Unknown 96 96 47 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 78 57 22 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 319 (F1) Unknown 99 99 78882297887	54.3% Above average	Read 262 Write 180 Mixed 184 46% 209 MB/s	4K Read 32 4K Write 37.4 4K Mixed 19.6 93% 29.6 MB/s	DQ Read 138 DQ Write 88.9 DQ Mixed 38.3 49% 88.5 MB/s
Poor: 78% ↑ This bench: 54.3% Great: 126%
WD Blue 500GB (2007)-$80 10,362 User benchmarks, average bench 38% 433GB free Firmware: 01.03B01 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 163 161 4833 (04) Start/Stop count 96 96 4046 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 253 0 (09) Power-on hours count 38 38 45334 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 812 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 206 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 199 199 4046 (C2) HDA temperature 120 100 27 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	61.4% Good	Read 108 Write 106 Mixed 92.9 77% 102 MB/s	4K Read 0.68 4K Write 1.98 4K Mixed 0.56 127% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 61.4% Great: 51%
Seagate Barracuda 4TB (2017)-$79 179,101 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 450GB free Firmware: 0001 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 77 64 55999330 (03) Spinup time 96 96 0 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 990 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 79 60 80600760 (09) Power-on hours count 98 98 3367254361903 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 68 (B7) Unknown 93 93 7 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 77 69 403636247 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 96 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 99 99 3353 (C2) HDA temperature 23 40 64424509463 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 77 64 55999330 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (F0) Head flying hours 100 253 94918777242717 (F1) Unknown 100 253 31830770196 (F2) Unknown 100 253 15082733279	48.6% Average	Read 94.7 Write 71.9 Mixed 58.8 56% 75.1 MB/s	4K Read 4.14 4K Write 5.62 4K Mixed 0.35 316% 3.37 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 48.6% Great: 90%
WD WD16 00HLHX-60JJPV0 160GB 12 User benchmarks, average bench 72% 149GB free Firmware: 04.0 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 191 190 1450 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 235 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 96 96 2985 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 192 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 99 1 (BE) vendor-specific 75 64 420479001 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 121 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 200 200 113 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	79.2% Very good	Read 140 Write 135 Mixed 131 102% 135 MB/s	4K Read 1.14 4K Write 3.29 4K Mixed 0.6 175% 1.68 MB/s
Poor: 67% ↑ This bench: 79.2% Great: 79%
Mushkin Ventura Ultra USB 3.0 60GB-$76 38 User benchmarks, average bench 143% 51GB free, PID 55aa Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile)	166% Outstanding	Read 140 Write 52.3 Mixed 76.7 100% 89.7 MB/s	4K Read 17 4K Write 42.4 4K Mixed 8.49 1,794% 22.6 MB/s	DQ Read 19.2 DQ Write 52.3 DQ Mixed 9.11 2,159% 26.9 MB/s
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 166% Great: 209%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown ID:80 2C 18JSF25672AZ-1G4G1 ID:80 CE M391B5673FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M391B5673FH0-CH9 ID:80 2C 18JSF25672AZ-1G4G1 ID:80 CE M391B5673FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M391B5673EH1-CH9 46GB 9 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz 2048, 2048, 2048, 2048, 2048, 2048, 34816 MB Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	27.2% Poor	MC Read 10.8 MC Write 5.8 MC Mixed 9 24% 8.53 GB/s	SC Read 9.7 SC Write 6.2 SC Mixed 8.2 23% 8.03 GB/s	Latency 72.5 55% 72.5 ns
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 27.2% Great: 52%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Z800 Workstation Builds (Compare 1,940 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 10%

Tree trunk

Desktop 60%

Destroyer

Workstation 10%

Tree trunk

System: HP Z800 Workstation

CPU
CPU: Intel Xeon X56501stBench 64%, 7,756 samples	318x
CPU: Intel Xeon X56751stBench 68%, 4,275 samples	188x
CPU: Intel Xeon X56701stBench 67%, 4,676 samples	179x

GPU
Quadro 4000NvidiaBench 7%, 8,609 samples	161x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	87x
Quadro 5000NvidiaBench 10%, 751 samples	67x

SSD
WDS100T2B0A-00SM50 1TBWDCBench 98%, 74,123 samples	38x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $109Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	34x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	34x

RAM
ID:80 CE M393B5170FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M393B5170FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M393B5170FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M393B5170FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M393B5170FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M393B5170FH0-CH9 58GBUnknownBench 50%, 261 samples	23x
ID:80 2C 36JSZF51272PZ1G4F1 ID:80 2C 36JSZF51272PZ1G4F1 ID:80 2C 36JSZF51272PZ1G4F1 ID:80 2C 36JSZF51272PZ1G4F1 ID:80 2C 36JSZF51272PZ1G4F1 ID:80 2C 36JSZF51272PZ1G4F1 ID:80 2C 36JSZF51272PZ1G4F1 JE... 82GBUnknownBench 53%, 67 samples	19x
ID:80 AD HMT31GR7BFR4C-H9 ID:80 AD HMT31GR7BFR4C-H9 ID:80 AD HMT31GR7BFR4C-H9 ID:80 AD HMT31GR7BFR4C-H9 ID:80 AD HMT31GR7BFR4C-H9 ID:80 AD HMT31GR7BFR4C-H9 ID:80 AD HMT31GR7BFR4C-H9 ID:80 AD H... 130GBUnknownBench 53%, 67 samples	15x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16